From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pankaj Jangid Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Would there be a drawback of using the same graphical toolkit on every platform? Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 15:31:30 +0530 Message-ID: <87v8xbyy2t.fsf@codeisgreat.org> References: <83tucvz53x.fsf@gnu.org> <87h78vfgri.fsf@zoho.eu> <83h78vz17w.fsf@gnu.org> <87czjjfck2.fsf@zoho.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25182"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:nnL6cWS4ntNvECO7TxRHsL5Wy/g= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 19 11:09:25 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nLMg8-0006Q8-0Z for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2022 11:09:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58118 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nLMg4-0006u8-Sf for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2022 05:09:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nLMf8-0006tt-1I for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2022 05:08:25 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:39908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nLMeV-0001jw-74 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2022 05:08:21 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nLMYb-0006Kd-CQ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2022 11:01:37 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:135998 Archived-At: Emanuel Berg via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor writes: >> What's GNU? Gnu's Not Unix! > > _That_'s the joke ... > > GNU isn't UNIX but it sure is Unix! > > As is Linux ... GNU utilities do make it appear like that. Otherwise, even the most basic shell commands are incompatible - ls/xargs/find... And Linux is a kernel. > See that "x"? Ever contemplated what that means? X marks > the unknown? > > So GNU/Linux that's even Unix**2 ... > > OpenBSD and so on are also Unix. But not macOS or Android, how > ever that would work? Don't be silly ... > > POSIX = Portable Operating System Interface, coined by RMS ... > or am I wrong? If GNU were UNIX, then there was no need for POSIX. I am talking purely from the user¡¯s point-of-view. If we talk about the idea then the gap is even wider.