From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#54245: 29.0.50; select usage in GNUstep Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 14:43:34 +0100 Message-ID: <87v8wgejjt.fsf@gmail.com> References: <877d99g2g1.fsf@gnus.org> <87r17hhexs.fsf@gmail.com> <87bkylqlbk.fsf@yahoo.com> <87mti4hby5.fsf@gmail.com> <87lexofcm5.fsf@gnus.org> <87h780ga7u.fsf@gmail.com> <83tuc0k7da.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4975"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 14 14:58:02 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nTlD0-00014F-Pq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 14:58:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56566 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nTlCz-0005iO-Is for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 09:58:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45050) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nTkz4-0007da-UA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 09:43:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [2a00:1450:4864:20::430] (port=45586 helo=mail-wr1-x430.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nTkz3-0002oM-Cc; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 09:43:38 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id p9so24021070wra.12; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 06:43:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sLO7nmF+RFhwWVVVHe9UIT445tNXHc7ANHB9Kqexc3g=; b=DYUr5sQDZC/VvwCyw5Mhc2MHFxdUghEznMedpfbAfSyApCyJYoaME7PxIvY3G8FXOK ohSDeIZWJZxLB0bToq7ZNyIF+0K7Dh1/a/3dmC9gOrIb9Fs1q3rbHvRXBMQFKxSv2CuJ 2aWqGckedn+eQ/EA5GNK0zPx6OoH+4R/LL8hOTY3JivGYz3lSWj4s6mcIit7PGpYf5Nr YFBkSuGptUTel3BrnEPnzNnwE69IlPHVzab2HkNhzbtjo93PJ/tSfOD2FyTIzpczGEGl U7UAMXQQnEfla4fEQgMjg2cXSRFK5Ll5GhMatKj26218b9bFPQVJj6FkG8QAqqIMSWQ+ 5OsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sLO7nmF+RFhwWVVVHe9UIT445tNXHc7ANHB9Kqexc3g=; b=imjePuUc5CudBRHA1b/DFSdpjvNMhGtdmNkDSOg0aWYXNdUGa7xuGmetf5BEhRAwoZ GtDtX6QEyfNjcXCwyp7+usjvaaOAoJFgPhqy9Y2xhe8C5og3/pcGWZtYpObba8F5bLgG wiYwGKBsYizdp2mkZY9pTQ5sKwUJPqbx/LExkyRBhXQGRfWVAV3CBVzopUyXxJHXMp4v mjInAmgvNLGbA9EA+VCpDIwbOKEaJV0YCPiQDlhE7hNtSuFogSt20uSosvOKQKIkYdl+ i0YjjVv5/vxrO+ZUHA3h66tL0IvSLzzC8/vYwCuw6NDMowGQ9ZmYmXpN1+6nMbE22Nnn R8Pg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533vu2gYvTMXgkZcovjLyvxj1XN1N1pDDyFGPtjZsq8pycVzDi+i 7/TXlHeVqQCl6T8k5qnamLJ+vI4A2J8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxa8YCGDHM6A1svd3yWVVMgOQ91E3oh2RiYxJ8ethmITYYC9E4QWePFhyGBHqJ8+9BORnmVBA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2a8:b0:203:7a50:5dfe with SMTP id l8-20020a05600002a800b002037a505dfemr16747753wry.260.1647265415327; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 06:43:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([2a01:e0a:3f3:fb50:effd:6151:f762:886a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o7-20020a5d6707000000b001f067c7b47fsm22355479wru.27.2022.03.14.06.43.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 14 Mar 2022 06:43:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83tuc0k7da.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:10:09 +0200") X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:1450:4864:20::430 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::430; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x430.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.659, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:287145 Archived-At: >>>>> On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:10:09 +0200, Eli Zaretskii said: >> I think this means we can now remove the checking for select in >> configure, and the HAVE_SELECT define (I took a look, but then ran >> into the w32 and msdos ports, and decided to stop :-) ) Eli> If that's your problem, you could convert HAVE_SELECT into DOS_NT,= I Eli> think. It=CA=BCs not really a problem, it=CA=BCs more "Is the issue serious enough= to potentially break builds for other people that I can=CA=BCt easily test" Eli> The HAVE_SELECT in msdos.c is for the (old and quite defunct) MSDOS Eli> build with Xlib (yes, there was such a beast: see those HAVE_X_WIN= DOWS Eli> in msdos.c?), so IMNSHO we can simply drop HAVE_SELECT in msdos.c. Although this makes it sound like I=CA=BCm worrying too much about potential breakage. Robert --=20