From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 6a2ee981c3: Add new functions for splitting the root window Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:47:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87v8pifpxb.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <166240424802.11417.12502552895310232639@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220905185728.838CEC0088A@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <86h71kseiw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87illzmjew.fsf@gnus.org> <868rmvxdvj.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87bkrq5bmb.fsf@gnus.org> <86k06dn6up.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87pmg4v5ml.fsf@gnus.org> <87leqsmpdq.fsf@gmail.com> <87h7122a2u.fsf@dataswamp.org> <864jx2r130.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29314"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:pimZ7Eyi9kRXwq0cdiuEdvGTM94= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 20 13:20:06 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oabIL-0007Ps-2I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 13:20:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57956 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oabIK-000063-4t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 07:20:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38682) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oaXyZ-0007LN-Ba for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 03:47:27 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:50418) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oaXyX-000228-K8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 03:47:27 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oaXyS-0006Uw-D2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:47:20 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 06:51:03 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:295796 Archived-At: Juri Linkov wrote: >> (defun other-window-or-split () >> (interactive) >> (when (one-window-p) >> (split-window-below) ) >> (other-window 1) ) > > A.k.a. windmove-create-window. OK, I don't have that ... >> (defun swap-windows () >> (interactive) >> (let ((buffer (current-buffer))) >> (other-window 1) >> (switch-to-buffer-other-window (current-buffer)) >> (other-window 1) >> (switch-to-buffer buffer) )) > > A.k.a. windmove-swap-states. Same ... >> (defun window-increase-size (&optional lines) >> (interactive "p") >> (unless (one-window-p) >> (or lines (setq lines 1)) >> (window-resize nil lines) )) >> >> (defun window-decrease-size (&optional lines) >> (interactive "p") >> (unless (one-window-p) >> (or lines (setq lines 1)) >> (window-resize nil (* -1 lines) ))) > > It was proposed to add this on 'C-x w r left/right/up/down' 'C-x w' is undefined here, but if you add that (by "this" you mean the shortcuts?) I'd add it with i, l, i and k instead (or "as well"). 'C-x' is not so ergonomic tho ... I take it 'w' is mnemonic for "window" and 'r' for "resize", I think that should only be considered when the keys are good. But they are. -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal