From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Summary by thread in rmail Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 21:23:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87v8owlpt2.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <83zge9p81i.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilkx6x2l.fsf@autistici.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15430"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:7YrDhMgsPQb8lr12UyztS6OrP+g= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 06 21:38:55 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ogWhp-0003jN-3F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 21:38:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57182 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogWho-00055i-6D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 15:38:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50082) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogWUU-0005CY-SA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 15:25:07 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:35550) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogWUT-0003Ga-6i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 15:25:06 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ogWUQ-0006SD-Lx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 21:25:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 15:37:31 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297118 Archived-At: Andrea Monaco wrote: >> Still a pity that it guesses its threads by Subject: >> instead of using In-Reply-To: and References: > > I think recognizing threads based on the Subject field is > correct in most cases. Anyway, that is > a possible enhancement. There are problems associated with it as we have seen even in this thread (sorry :P) ... So it is obvious the discussion can go both ways ... But if you find a good name for it - maybe use the word "subject" in the command is enough - and also say something to this end in the docstring that it isn't the other method that some people maybe would expect otherwise ... -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal