From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Monthy emacs-devel digest, similar to "This month in Org" Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2023 11:13:39 +0000 Message-ID: <87v8cnsgf0.fsf@localhost> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87cyz3qwba.fsf@posteo.net> <8734zztmiz.fsf@localhost> <87sf7zqs3l.fsf@yahoo.com> <87il8vs6e7.fsf@localhost> <87jztbqrc9.fsf@yahoo.com> <877cpbs5a0.fsf@localhost> <87fs3zqqgj.fsf@yahoo.com> <874jkfs4o0.fsf@localhost> <87y1hroz47.fsf@posteo.net> <87edjiryi5.fsf@localhost> <877cpavw8h.fsf@posteo.net> <87ttsce66b.fsf@posteo.net> <87bkej24gv.fsf@posteo.net> <871qffof8l.fsf@localhost> <83a5u38x4p.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7ijmycl.fsf@localhost> <8334zv8w47.fsf@gnu.org> <87jzt7mx9z.fsf@localhost> <83zg237g85.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33694"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: philipk@posteo.net, casouri@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 06 13:14:10 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qdqU5-0008Uh-Jl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 13:14:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qdqT9-0007uS-DR; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 07:13:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qdqT7-0007qM-SD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 07:13:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qdqT3-0004lo-Ct for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 07:13:08 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE9DF240103 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 13:13:01 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1693998781; bh=ZxmrvJ6w16T4iut8EAEzVSPqBnvxu7wGAkJJbkvCyhw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=oZLyfwExbXixXCvHJ46L7HzrCHTDo5c/JI1T3pwGws3nZTCc6uzQzsYNgBYGlDdaO 0f22b6H3sJIkmEJM7ERHxYD3U+RhgdsXSdTyQGgCQs9ZvpSkeBiXkRlwMDm98YaPIp L0D7S3HlGDgt2pje06dvGMiliUTF8inj5DLzUKiWrB8eP2yfVDc5zmLfeOcdyzHhPj o7WeDSz87BO89tWEl2ZT1ZPrEbdzk4ms9ktVJbcdoTK9YTtB6/DOPG8TXvedbMoxOh jB1VYtNhdNSS+dbLEpK9nc/z8Bxyp70cuZ6SSfNLHhQ8bwCQQlHyT0u0gCRbq1mobb dwNpjX4qHKCAw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RgfqZ4XBcz6txQ; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 13:12:58 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83zg237g85.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:310181 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> How can people who are not actively reading emacs-devel notice such >> requests? (scratching my head why I wrote it this way...) > But you also suggest to do so in a special thread on emacs-devel, so > how is that different? What I meant is that requests scattered across all threads might go unnoticed, even if someone is collecting such requests for the discussed digest. If Emacs devs instead put the most important requests into a dedicated thread, it would be much easier to see them and put into the digest. Another option might be changing email subject to [HELP] ... or [POLL] ... (that's what we usually do in Org mailing list) -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at