From: Kai Grossjohann <kai@emptydomain.de>
Subject: Re: autorevert.el
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 12:29:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87u10tugs2.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200403130310.i2D3A8w28676@raven.dms.auburn.edu
Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu> writes:
> What do people think of just completely getting rid of these dired
> "Reading directory /home/teirllm/...done" messages?
Good idea.
> How do we prevent autorevert.el from using inappropriate
> revert-buffer-function's?
I'm not sure. Maybe the way is to make all revert-buffer-functions be
appropriate.
If I understand your message correctly, then the problem with the
buffer menu revert function is that it pops up the window even if it
wasn't visible before. Then, for this case, one approach would be to
change the revert function to just update the contents of the buffer
menu buffer, instead of also popping up the window.
> Would anybody actually find auto-reverting the buffer-menu useful?
Oh, yes! Quite often, I'm wondering about the strange list of
buffers, because I'm not aware that I need to revert the buffer.
(Though I use ibuffer these days.)
> It might be a good test case, but I do not know whether it really
> would be useful enough. Or are there any other non-file, non-vc,
> non-dired buffers people would like to autorevert?
The *compilation* buffers currently have a function that reruns the
compilation, I think. Maybe it would be good to just remove that, and
require people to use M-x recompile RET instead. Hooking
recompilation into reverting seems wrong to me, anyhow. But that's
just my taste.
Kai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-13 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-02 23:19 autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-03 13:24 ` autorevert.el Stefan Monnier
2004-03-04 5:08 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-04 20:43 ` autorevert.el Stefan Monnier
2004-03-05 4:00 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-13 3:10 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-13 11:29 ` Kai Grossjohann [this message]
2004-03-14 23:15 ` autorevert.el Stefan Monnier
2004-03-15 0:08 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-15 2:58 ` autorevert.el Stefan Monnier
2004-03-15 7:04 ` autorevert.el Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-16 4:56 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-16 19:40 ` autorevert.el Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-19 4:48 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-19 6:06 ` autorevert.el Stefan Monnier
2004-03-21 2:42 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-23 15:26 ` autorevert.el Stefan Monnier
2004-03-24 4:20 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-24 4:25 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-21 4:19 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-19 10:19 ` autorevert.el Kim F. Storm
2004-03-19 14:46 ` autorevert.el Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-21 3:26 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-21 6:46 ` autorevert.el Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-22 2:44 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-22 6:51 ` autorevert.el Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-22 19:39 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-23 19:40 ` autorevert.el Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-23 20:09 ` autorevert.el Stefan Monnier
2004-03-24 4:10 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-24 6:58 ` autorevert.el Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-24 18:03 ` autorevert.el Stefan Monnier
2004-03-25 6:56 ` autorevert.el Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-25 17:01 ` autorevert.el Stefan Monnier
2004-03-24 18:56 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-25 6:20 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-25 6:49 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-25 7:21 ` autorevert.el Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-22 19:47 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-22 16:23 ` autorevert.el Stefan Monnier
2004-03-23 4:24 ` autorevert.el Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-21 19:22 ` autorevert.el Richard Stallman
2004-03-16 5:06 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-05 4:25 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-05 5:55 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
2004-03-04 5:34 ` autorevert.el Luc Teirlinck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87u10tugs2.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de \
--to=kai@emptydomain.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.