From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: "Kim F. Storm" <storm@cua.dk>, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Risky local variable mechanism
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:03:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87u0b7f8ym.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k6c3ojyp.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:34:38 -0500")
> Each local variable can be safe, risky, or neither. A variable-value
> pair is safe if it is found in the new customizable alist
> `safe-local-variables', or the variable's `safe-local-variables'
> property is t, or the variable's `safe-local-variables' property is a
> function that evaluates to t with that value.
The property should probably not be called `safe-local-variables' since it
applies to a single variable and talks about its possible values. I.e. it
should be something like `safe-local-variable' or `safe-local-values'.
Other than that, it sounds OK to me. I don't know how important it is to
have this notion of `risky', but it can't hurt.
Stefan
PS: I haven't actually looked at the code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-10 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-31 23:09 Risky local variable mechanism Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-01 0:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-01 0:41 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-01 2:39 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-02 4:17 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-02 12:42 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-02-03 23:43 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-04 4:34 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-05 17:34 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-06 6:00 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-07 6:07 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-07 2:47 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-07 16:45 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-08 1:49 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-08 2:09 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-08 2:18 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-08 4:30 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-08 4:56 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-08 5:02 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-08 5:00 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-08 5:28 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-08 3:13 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-08 4:51 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-08 5:07 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-08 5:25 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-08 6:00 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-08 13:35 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-08 21:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-08 6:06 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-08 6:49 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-08 5:48 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-08 6:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-08 6:17 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-08 6:48 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-09 17:47 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-09 17:47 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-10 23:57 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-08 9:21 ` Juri Linkov
2006-02-08 12:48 ` Disabled commands (was: Risky local variable mechanism) Stefan Monnier
2006-02-09 17:48 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-09 22:07 ` Disabled commands Stefan Monnier
2006-02-10 2:30 ` Miles Bader
2006-02-10 7:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-13 8:36 ` Bill Wohler
2006-02-13 9:26 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-02-13 9:43 ` Giorgos Keramidas
2006-02-13 13:54 ` Romain Francoise
2006-02-09 18:46 ` Kevin Rodgers
2006-02-08 15:45 ` Risky local variable mechanism Drew Adams
2006-02-09 3:58 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-09 17:48 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-10 5:34 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-10 17:03 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2006-02-10 17:54 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-11 0:31 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-12 1:00 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-12 4:30 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-11 3:31 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-12 1:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-12 1:15 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-11 16:44 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-14 1:33 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-14 2:50 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-14 22:17 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-14 3:16 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-14 3:32 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-14 3:38 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-14 3:48 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-14 4:11 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-14 4:26 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-16 14:02 ` safe-local-variable additions (was: Risky local variable mechanism) Reiner Steib
2006-02-17 2:47 ` safe-local-variable additions Chong Yidong
2006-02-17 14:30 ` Reiner Steib
2006-02-02 12:47 ` Risky local variable mechanism Kim F. Storm
2006-02-01 2:30 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-02 4:15 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-02 9:54 ` David Kastrup
2006-02-02 14:54 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-02-03 5:04 ` Richard M. Stallman
[not found] <E1F46oA-0005O8-FC@monty-python.gnu.org>
2006-02-01 15:24 ` Jonathan Yavner
2006-02-01 17:00 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-01 23:31 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-02-02 5:05 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-02-01 23:12 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-02 16:21 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-02 17:00 ` Stefan Monnier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-02 8:14 LENNART BORGMAN
2006-02-10 18:13 risky " Jonathan Yavner
2006-02-11 3:19 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-13 4:40 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-11 17:08 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-11 20:27 ` Jonathan Yavner
2006-02-11 20:46 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-12 19:29 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-12 19:52 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-13 20:05 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-02-13 21:03 ` Chong Yidong
2006-02-12 1:10 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-02-12 19:29 ` Richard M. Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87u0b7f8ym.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=storm@cua.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.