From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: michael@cadilhac.name (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: line-move-partial too costly ? Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:58:33 +0200 Organization: Epita/LRDE Message-ID: <87u03amwp2.fsf@lrde.org> References: <87k647501r.fsf@lrde.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1979686400==" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1158238710 18027 80.91.229.2 (14 Sep 2006 12:58:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:58:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac , storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 14 14:58:25 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNqnL-000898-OD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:58:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNqnL-0006YM-BE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:58:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GNqn8-0006Wc-CF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:58:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GNqn7-0006WP-JT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:58:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNqn7-0006WM-DL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:58:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.39.139.2] (helo=kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GNqp1-0007e8-GD; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:00:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mahaena.lrde.epita.fr ([192.168.101.66] helo=mahaena.lrde) by kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GNqmy-0004Cv-9V; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:57:56 +0200 Original-To: Miles Bader Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEVWPh+Tai+5r5YKBAEU CQQzGAtiq7gjAAACR0lEQVQ4jW2UzW7lIAyFzVW8BzTZX5DmCZLuU2H2pMXv/ypzbK7aSh2kRCRf /HNsE0q7Sg+RQ7JFKaqtrRNAl5AIIKe6D5DBqgbmUAe5hBI1wIRFAHjeM0RKtZi7XVVEpb0BSNfA IddChChT5DildSLWOWhY5IEItMnncZgFcUAc/5jjwCMsDosRNdfKPDTFEdVBW8C+RebDb4N5Orio RhM1+11IJyx0ng2+LryFHBMPDQDYHrY6IfGuU3ouiXTQNE8LIJDKOWpNxERTFrggQwRPd7USUsTW fJ0XbR3bdj5KgBYy4SACpxDeUYEUAzLmtJ1iIrD2gczPq8Qomjhsh/RjGIgKIO8p7NITjwlx7WID nsnQe5NeuTvoBpi8LX6vLLOh5icjOHqBypgnuSp7M+RE1agbQKHQr5E2z1WObhYW4gMqeGQL7joM jCf2DxSk5ApADSYHfFF4igNfJZL1z0GKP0FN02s4XiDXr7V5P94W6I9v8MfBOQDmfwAaVYt+x8Da v4DJvX8BAdin3Knm5yMZYAO4ABDkDniZLLfi4P40gP1F0TPGZOu0CGwA1lcowxwlGy6A9705mD0V jHCxwVZT/hYdRJVUGZNlx6l7ScQBTluof6Wj6bsPYlvpwoTvXFD9gHPn2TZPF3ntI2ecxVrW5MrV XiCie5EeNa7BlWu/HNSkprDUva163PHxAv5jyGV7gVzyAghSKOTnat85UIYFICXbD2NV9rRiv0BS tKQsg6OHH4A15F1WW+UHKHHa32h6aPnAm3/pUcWp+WYnTQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== In-Reply-To: (Miles Bader's message of "Thu\, 14 Sep 2006 21\:29\:08 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59836 Archived-At: --===============1979686400== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Miles Bader writes: > michael@cadilhac.name (Micha=EBl Cadilhac) writes: >> I don't think my computer, with an Athlon XP 2000+, is too old to not >> be concerned by Emacs user-friendliness :-) >> >> With emacs -Q, if I entirely fill the scratch buffer (150 columns, 75 >> lines) and then press C-n and _stay on it_,[1] the cursor is blocked >> at the second line. When C-n is released, Emacs responds only after >> a second or so. > > Something seems very strange -- I'm on a slower computer than you, but > see absolutely no slowdown in the above scenario.... This is true > whether I use -q or not. Thanks for testing! Did you use a particular keyboard rate? With the default X one, I don't have this problem. =2D-=20 /!\ My mail address changed, please update your files accordingly. | Micha=EBl `Micha' Cadilhac | Isn't vi that text editor with = | | Epita/LRDE Promo 2007 | two modes... One that beeps and = | | http://michael.cadilhac.name | one that corrupts your file? = | `-- - JID: micha@amessage.be --' -- Dan Jacobson - -= -' --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFCVH5ZYNf4qobZ7kRAopeAJ9S/alA8O5hLoewd+x/qqLDygFqcgCgtnm+ wP0buwMf4cAFFE9XCbHjtHY= =ayva -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --===============1979686400== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel --===============1979686400==--