From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gnus-summary-tick-article-forward doesn't work any more? Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 18:44:47 -0500 Message-ID: <87u00ctuhc.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165191621 26826 80.91.229.10 (4 Dec 2006 00:20:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 00:20:21 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 04 01:20:20 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gr1ZB-000668-Dv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 01:20:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gr1ZB-0004eI-60 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 19:20:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gr1Z1-0004bN-0d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 19:20:07 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gr1Z0-0004b8-J9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 19:20:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gr1Z0-0004b5-G6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 19:20:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Gr1Z0-00037z-4z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 19:20:06 -0500 Original-Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Gr1Yw-0006bD-1I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 01:20:02 +0100 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu ([18.19.1.138]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 01:20:02 +0100 Original-Received: from cyd by cyd.mit.edu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Dec 2006 01:20:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cyd.mit.edu User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:+4ppkja6M8fh8cmsrcKehCd0lAc= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63253 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Recently I started to notice ticks being dropped in Gnus. I first thought > that maybe my IMAP server had changed and didn't allow tick marks any more > (I access my IMAP server from a few different computers so if a tick is only > recorded in the .newsrc rather than on the IMAP server it will appear to > have been lost when I read my email from the other machine). I haven't seen this bug, and I also use Gnus imap with heavy use of ticks. Is it still happening to you?