From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: new Emacs maintainer(s)? Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:25:19 +0200 Message-ID: <87tztlbcs0.fsf@kfs-lx.testafd.dk> References: <878xb05ras.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <200706041853.l54IrLXb006451@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200706051632.l55GWNSZ026462@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <87ps4aue45.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87fy55cy7v.fsf@kfs-lx.testafd.dk> <86y7ixjwtd.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181125575 18940 80.91.229.12 (6 Jun 2007 10:26:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 06 12:26:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HvsiS-0007y5-Gw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:26:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HvsiS-0003ln-16 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 06:26:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HvsiO-0003lW-5B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 06:26:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HvsiK-0003lC-KY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 06:26:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HvsiK-0003l9-E5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 06:26:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-relay.sonofon.dk ([212.88.64.25]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HvsiJ-00067a-LZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 06:26:04 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 25419 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2007 10:26:01 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-lx.testafd.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 6 Jun 2007 10:26:01 -0000 In-Reply-To: <86y7ixjwtd.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Wed\, 06 Jun 2007 10\:45\:18 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72320 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: My ideal setup would be: Emacs 22.x (maintenance): Richard (who can still pull on anyone to actually merge/adapt desired fixes from the trunk to the 22.x branch). Emacs 23.1: A committee of Handa [technical lead], Chong [release manager], and a third person (e.g. Stefan). Emacs 23.x (maintenance): One of the above (or somebody else ?) Emacs 24.1: A committee of Eli [technical lead], ? [release manager], and a third person (perferably someone with interest in BIDI). I thing that once unicode and multi-tty are merged to the trunk, the bidi work for 24.1 can gain quite some momentum, so it would be good to form the 24.1 committee quite soon! -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk