From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Bug in Emacs 23 ?? [Was: Is there anything to replace ido?] Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 00:31:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87tzrgmerf.fsf_-_@kfs-lx.testafd.dk> References: <87odhq7wb8.fsf@kfs-lx.testafd.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1186180360 20344 80.91.229.12 (3 Aug 2007 22:32:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 22:32:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 04 00:32:36 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IH5hA-0006NC-7r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 00:32:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IH5h6-0004h8-Jj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:32:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IH5h3-0004gq-R1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:32:25 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IH5gx-0004dM-VW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:32:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IH5gx-0004dJ-Qm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:32:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-relay.sonofon.dk ([212.88.64.25]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IH5gt-0006Wk-UI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:32:18 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 79643 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2007 22:31:33 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-lx.testafd.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 3 Aug 2007 22:31:33 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Fri\, 03 Aug 2007 01\:16\:33 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76018 Archived-At: Leo has reported some strange freezes related to buffer switching with ido-mode enabled. Here's the result of looking at the process when emacs hangs. He's using Emacs 23. Anyone want to look into this? Leo writes: > On 2007-08-01 22:56 +0100, Kim F. Storm wrote: >> If you run emacs under a debugger, can you interrupt it >> and use xbacktrace to see what > > When it freezes, I type "C-c" in gdb and type `bt', `xba' and `bt full'. > > The log is: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > No stack. > > Lisp Backtrace: > Cannot access memory at address 0xbfffd864 > Cannot access memory at address 0xbfffd864 > No stack. > > Lisp Backtrace: > Cannot access memory at address 0xbfffd864 > Cannot access memory at address 0xbfffd864 > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk