From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: visual-line-mode Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:23:14 -0400 Message-ID: <87tzf6c5il.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87zlp4raab.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87d4lzehq2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87skuqbwr8.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <85E9BC5B-7337-4CD4-A783-6B2FAEBAEBCA@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1215167150 23938 80.91.229.12 (4 Jul 2008 10:25:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 10:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel , "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" , Stefan Monnier , Miles Bader To: David Reitter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 04 12:26:35 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KEiUq-0005JZ-T5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:26:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42464 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KEiTx-0003jD-PD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:25:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KEiS1-0002Bk-So for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:23:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KEiS0-0002AO-7S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:23:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42845 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KEiRz-0002A8-RA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:23:36 -0400 Original-Received: from c-24-63-201-57.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.63.201.57]:15636 helo=furry) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KEiRh-0003eH-3u; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:23:17 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CF54516DC02; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 06:23:14 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <85E9BC5B-7337-4CD4-A783-6B2FAEBAEBCA@gmail.com> (David Reitter's message of "Fri, 4 Jul 2008 00:56:59 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:100334 Archived-At: David Reitter writes: > OK, it seems that (vertical-motion 0) is reliable now with your patch, > but (vertical-motion 1) will sometimes move point to the beginning of > the last word in the line (or so), possibly when the visual line is > fairly long. It looks as if it anticipates the word to be wrapped, > even though it isn't. Please provide a detailed recipe. (If the recipe refers to `posn-point', that would be even better.)