From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Phil Hagelberg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ruby-mode.el paperwork Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:56:00 -0700 Message-ID: <87tzav552n.fsf@hagelb.org> References: <87zlkn59fa.fsf@hagelb.org> <2nprljvun6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1225324581 28961 80.91.229.12 (29 Oct 2008 23:56:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 30 00:57:21 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KvKue-0002oJ-2y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:57:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43958 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KvKtX-0003tN-N4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:56:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KvKtS-0003tC-OP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KvKtR-0003su-56 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48017 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KvKtR-0003sr-0I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:56:05 -0400 Original-Received: from sd-green-bigip-177.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.177]:45516 helo=spunkymail-a18.g.dreamhost.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KvKtO-0005i0-SW; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:56:03 -0400 Original-Received: from dynabook (unknown [64.81.164.191]) by spunkymail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A75A5B4F7; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:56:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2nprljvun6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:39:09 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:105161 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > Did they ever answer the following question: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-05/msg01512.html > > Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote (on Mon, 29 Oct 2007 at 18:02 +0900): > > > * there were other contributers in past, but we can't contact > > them now. > > Richard Stallman said that if the two of you are willing to sign > assignments, we can ask a lawyer whether we need to worry about > unknown authors. Can you estimate how much code these other > contributors wrote (in total, and per author)? > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-10/msg00364.html They have said that the contributions from other authors have been trivial. -Phil