From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr repository ready? Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:28:07 -0500 Message-ID: <87tz7at8m0.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <87zli4jcc4.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> <87vdsrjcco.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> <87fxjgb4ud.fsf_-_@red-bean.com> <87eiyy3lag.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87bpu1451m.fsf@red-bean.com> <874ozs34c6.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87k58nyih3.fsf@red-bean.com> <87ocxxrjnh.fsf@canonical.com> <874ozp4ld3.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87ocxrgm4g.fsf@canonical.com> <87y6wvhxrk.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <8763jwg1j8.fsf@red-bean.com> <87y6wsd0ll.fsf@red-bean.com> <8763jwb81u.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233768565 29404 80.91.229.12 (4 Feb 2009 17:29:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:29:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Karl Fogel , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii , "Stephen J. Turnbull" , Jason Earl To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 04 18:30:37 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LUla2-0001qw-Km for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:30:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35384 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUlYj-0007Oh-Lp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:29:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUlXt-0007Fv-Oi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:28:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUlXs-0007Ed-5S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:28:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39857 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUlXr-0007EO-TK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:28:15 -0500 Original-Received: from sanpietro.red-bean.com ([66.146.193.61]:58586) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUlXp-0001AH-MJ; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:28:13 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51160 helo=floss ident=kfogel) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LUlXk-0002jZ-J6; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:28:08 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Sat, 31 Jan 2009 09:59:27 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108744 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > Karl Fogel writes: > >> I'm puzzled because, as far as CVS is concerned, there really was a >> change here: on the 'lexbind' branch, lisp/cua-start.el received a >> change in revision 1.50.2.39, and that change was a result of >> "Merge from emacs--devo--0". > > That's only because CVS has no way to represent merges. The real change > happend on the master branch. Okay, this puzzle has been solved: that change was a merge to the 'lexbind' branch, and indeed, I've found it in Bazaar in that branch. Sorry for the noise. Continuing my conversion spot-check, I've uploaded the results so far: http://www.red-bean.com/kfogel/emacs-bzr-switchover/sanity-checks.txt (76 KB, a bit large for the mailing list maybe.) Results so far: individual changes seem okay, but there are some problems with branches and tags. It looks like not all CVS tags are present. Some of those might be branch-point tags (and thus unnecessary in git or bzr)... but how the conversion would recognize them as such I don't know. And it's a lot of tags missing: like, 224 of them. As for branches: all the CVS branches appear to be present in Bazaar, but there are still a few questions. Jason, Andreas, and anyone else, if you could take a look in that file and offer your thoughts, I'd appreciate it. The strings to search for are: "Spot-check a branch-sync change." "Check that all tags are present." "Check that all branches are present." -Karl