From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-w3m? Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:57:01 +0900 Message-ID: <87tyt2ygyq.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <3E1D063D-AC8A-4E40-B9F8-6ACA5089C4A7@gmail.com> <873a0p1dqt.fsf@telefonica.net> <87r5o9yr4y.fsf@telefonica.net> <87mxywzx2r.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ocjcejeo.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83r5o8l3oo.fsf@gnu.org> <873a0nyqjx.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87sk8nx7ba.fsf@telefonica.net> <83y6iedi2e.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267274747 24444 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2010 12:45:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 27 13:45:42 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlM3A-0000Ef-8T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:45:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32975 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NlM39-0002GG-MD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:45:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NlM34-0002G6-Es for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:45:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41076 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NlM33-0002Fu-OJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:45:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlM33-0005T3-0v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:45:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]:33566) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlM31-0005Sl-GT; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:45:31 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172501537BA; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:45:30 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ED6F8120772; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:57:01 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <83y6iedi2e.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" a03421eb562b XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121430 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > The second sentence explains the rationale behind this feature. But > in this case, Bob mistakenly added a single file, and that ended up > adding the whole directory. I don't think so. I read that doc as saying it adds ancestors, but not their contents, and a quick test shows it to be so: $ mkdir test; cd test; bzr init Created a standalone tree (format: 2a) $ mkdir subdir $ for i in foo bar; do echo $i > subdir/$i; done $ bzr add subdir/foo adding subdir adding subdir/foo $ bzr status added: subdir/ subdir/foo unknown: subdir/bar $ I don't know what Bob did, but I think it was more inclusive (presumably by Bazaar DWIM behavior) than adding a single file.