From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-23 release branch Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:34:23 -0500 Message-ID: <87tyso13og.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87zl2g24xy.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83d3zc2iqr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268242669 395 80.91.229.12 (10 Mar 2010 17:37:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:37:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 10 18:37:44 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NpPqm-0007wB-TG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:37:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60860 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NpPqm-0007c4-1D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:37:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NpPne-00056W-MG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:34:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53706 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NpPnd-00055k-Oj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:34:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NpPnd-0001rW-3U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:34:25 -0500 Original-Received: from pantheon-po25.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.119]:33279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NpPnd-0001rP-04; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:34:25 -0500 Original-Received: from furry (dhcp128036014175.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.175]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po25.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o2AHYO8x009793 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:34:24 -0500 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0D1B1C011; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:34:24 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83d3zc2iqr.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:23:40 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121775 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Does this mean it is okay to merge my local bidi branch with mainline > any time I feel like it? Yes, if the bidi branch is in a usable state, please do so.