From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What is emacs architecture ? Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:00:01 +0900 Message-ID: <87tynuc0y6.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <20100707.150746.549331509773933118.yamato@redhat.com> <87aaq3qpo7.fsf@kslab.red-bean.com> <8739vvxkqr.fsf@escher.home> <8739vvoyak.fsf@kslab.red-bean.com> <87tyoas9o4.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87iq4p6fj2.fsf@kslab.red-bean.com> <87r5iz4jn2.fsf@telefonica.net> <930432A0-2110-4A31-88B6-BFB35D07380F@mit.edu> <87iq4azyvs.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279594822 3831 80.91.229.12 (20 Jul 2010 03:00:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 03:00:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes , Chad Brown , Fren Zeee , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 20 05:00:18 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ob345-0005rs-Sh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 05:00:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55443 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ob345-0002Hw-BF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:00:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39710 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ob340-0002Gh-BN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:00:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ob33z-0007cB-9K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:00:12 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp12.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.74]:57524) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ob33y-0007bU-W0; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:00:11 -0400 Original-Received: from 218.33.232.67.eo.eaccess.ne.jp ([218.33.232.67] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp12.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1Ob33q-0000GQ-Ll; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:00:02 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8FB02DF8A; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:00:01 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <87iq4azyvs.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (Stephen J. Turnbull's message of "Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:10:47 +0900") Original-Lines: 11 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV GOL (outbound) X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127597 Archived-At: "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > Aside: This consistency is likely to change in certain ways in the > future, since I don't see a lot of appetite among Emacs developers for > Linux-kernel-style rebasing before pushing Hmm, doesn't bzr "discourage" rebasing? -Miles -- Would you like fries with that?