From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-d deleting region considered harmful Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:07:09 +0200 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <87tylkzkia.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <87eicrx1ls.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <83lj6zz9o0.fsf@gnu.org> <87bp7setll.fsf@altern.org> <871v8obqya.fsf@altern.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284984900 12094 80.91.229.12 (20 Sep 2010 12:15:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:15:00 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 20 14:14:59 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxfGt-0003R6-0i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:14:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52060 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxfGs-0001QM-83 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:14:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42528 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxfGZ-0001Cq-8Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:14:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oxf9a-0000vc-Qb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:07:27 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:52191) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oxf9a-0000vM-JP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:07:26 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oxf9Y-0000My-IW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:07:24 +0200 Original-Received: from p508eacdd.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.142.172.221]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:07:24 +0200 Original-Received: from dak by p508eacdd.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:07:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p508eacdd.dip.t-dialin.net X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:UJxJrC7Tz3dlzqVRf7Ma+rLQaeI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130529 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Bastien >> Cc: lennart.borgman@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, drew.adams@oracle.com, miles@gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:21:49 +0200 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> But besides that, is there any reason why no poll has been made so far? >> > >> > Because we know better without any polls? >> >> The problem is we all might have a different interpretation of "we". > > I meant _my_ interpretation. Shouldn't that read "We meant _our_ interpretation" for consistency? -- David Kastrup