From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7802: bug #7802: 24.0.50; Extraneous `mouse-3' event when do `double-mouse-3' Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 00:01:05 +0800 Message-ID: <87tyhje666.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6AF23E536D254FC88C35DA0BEC775C1A@us.oracle.com> <7EB632A3268149CA89DA1D58C8046A01@us.oracle.com> <9496EDBB00F3470E9417340D3CDBA5E1@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294503852 22761 80.91.229.12 (8 Jan 2011 16:24:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 16:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7802@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 08 17:24:08 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PbbaJ-0007ne-3F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 17:24:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60725 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PbbaI-0007Nm-DR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 11:24:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50447 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PbbaE-0007Ng-DC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 11:24:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PbbaC-0002Dn-MG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 11:24:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54667) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PbbaC-0002Dj-Iw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 11:24:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pbb7C-00055g-Bs; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 10:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jason Rumney Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 15:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7802 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7802-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7802.129450204019560 (code B ref 7802); Sat, 08 Jan 2011 15:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7802) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2011 15:54:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pbb79-00055R-OU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 10:54:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com ([209.85.210.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pbb78-00055G-IH for 7802@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 10:53:59 -0500 Original-Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so3382968pzk.3 for <7802@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 08:01:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=A2mkIVD0dqU+TXPBrhHmsMNgjbmSR4oPGSKaYxT2x6s=; b=aqolFgInLG6LIvmuKIhkMRz4ECWv8ebacftBALsg020KdNTLVghWmo0hPTGziZuIh4 nmqHusK/6gWdAuzpyY3xzLmz6WdR+Mu36+HaPdO/+Ma2X3T22UgTfODP4escoSoUvOyE eO318L/70CE29I2UppQFBFVfZ01a06azsIq5w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=DxLVK5bpuJ79pleJPvBT02b247TffQ6YUdHw5HvFL4TegtHwRFuHfNQxljus85NH/5 Xl40okNajRL8rWfcncB1JZQzIlCXpWZ7BO04u7TuDTDCeMQOfyqv+svZ8+vnKgJm2Mri hfvjEUwcJ8znTu7KSQOONx+88HKO6UG6LdmVI= Original-Received: by 10.142.82.4 with SMTP id f4mr2696408wfb.293.1294502477925; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 08:01:17 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from home.jasonrumney.net ([180.72.70.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e14sm4456906wfg.20.2011.01.08.08.01.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 08 Jan 2011 08:01:16 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by home.jasonrumney.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 17072E8B; Sun, 9 Jan 2011 00:01:05 +0800 (MYT) In-Reply-To: <9496EDBB00F3470E9417340D3CDBA5E1@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 7 Jan 2011 22:36:04 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 10:54:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43211 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > I'm no expert on these things, but isn't that what the system (whatever system > is handling mouse events) needs to do anyway? Doesn't Windows, for instance, > have to wait to see whether an event is a single-click, double-click, or > triple-click? No. Windows does the same as Emacs, which is why we inherit this behaviour. > I can't see how it could be otherwise (logically). I can't imagine > some action kicking in just as soon as the first click is detected, > without waiting to see whether the _user_ action is actually a single > click or is really a double click. The standard situation on Windows is rather more limited. There are no double click bindings for mouse-2 or mouse-3 in most programs or on the desktop, only for mouse-1. And the click event for mouse-1 generally selects the item below the mouse pointer, which the double click event then uses. > But why not just try to wait and see what the user action really is? How long do you propose to wait?