From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Recent change to describe-variable Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:05:52 -0400 Message-ID: <87tyeedk0f.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <874o6gur58.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301936783 16195 80.91.229.12 (4 Apr 2011 17:06:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 17:06:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 04 19:06:19 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6nEG-0003Wc-3p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:06:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55622 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q6nEE-0007bz-Ir for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:06:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41647 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q6nE0-0007Zy-Fl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:06:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6nDx-0000E1-Qi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:05:59 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.147]:56603) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6nDx-0000Dx-P0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:05:57 -0400 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014198.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.198]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p34H5qRB023922 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:05:53 -0400 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ABBF7160683; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:05:52 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:46:19 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.147 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.147 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138132 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> There doesn't seem to be any good reason to restrict the completion >> this way. > > There is no strong reason for this change, it just seemed like a good > idea since it eliminates keywords in a clean way. OK, so do you have any objection to bringing back the old behavior in the way suggested by Juanma?