From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 22:32:38 +0800 Message-ID: <87txx52l89.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87aa89uwfp.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <92DCBADB54F446EF9E76A3A6E723C239@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1342621993 31189 80.91.229.3 (18 Jul 2012 14:33:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9959@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kevin Rodgers Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 18 16:33:12 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SrVJO-0006WT-JQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:33:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47525 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SrVJN-0003aO-RU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:33:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44123) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SrVJC-0003ZR-Ux for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SrVJB-0006Kt-Qu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:32:58 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39046) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SrVJB-0006Ju-Mp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:32:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SrVP4-0004k5-1a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:39:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9959 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9959-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9959.134262233418215 (code B ref 9959); Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9959) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jul 2012 14:38:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48592 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SrVOv-0004jk-RT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:38:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com ([209.85.160.44]:41579) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SrVOt-0004jc-NB for 9959@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:38:52 -0400 Original-Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so2592499pbc.3 for <9959@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 07:32:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=qn1+1irBOHG2sSg/1AUR67VzrSgMlEPIdpZLqsbCui8=; b=pSLu7weE5uXHhWv1kaBNrVSLW6smK2YnsM/AP0654Sg0Ku38RLCSKvOrIwgqCt+G9X gxkpbrmBoU65zyEmF1UcbVko7GoPYFvVqTzNxeOh0/p18pI9Afz+VWgqnkRh/ElAWjoW 9LMImnOjGVBdH6hNlzYS7rgEg4st4aq/nKrmBL5Q1mdxBlb3MXaqeBba6zXZ21lv8Bpr KO+4XOrrTy3JXsVa3YsxOmniacJvpWp3am9B0AWNPJ+BBtRkd4d3ag4n9DSWjC71lm8F FV0aEuPA/iKGp9Qc54kxIzTr8gAihFLU89K0j4qUL+imiun5pRaZV8T5fq8zLg3L8fJl T/lw== Original-Received: by 10.68.217.40 with SMTP id ov8mr7873909pbc.131.1342621964786; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 07:32:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ulysses (cm162.gamma80.maxonline.com.sg. [202.156.80.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id of1sm16313547pbb.15.2012.07.18.07.32.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 18 Jul 2012 07:32:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Kevin Rodgers's message of "Tue, 08 Nov 2011 21:39:06 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:62105 Archived-At: Kevin Rodgers writes: > On 11/6/11 8:34 AM, Drew Adams wrote: > >> Or maybe both counts could be shown, making it a bit clearer what the info is? >> "Buffer (restriction): 1135 (112) lines, 6894 (673) words, 70452 >> (6074) chars". >> And in that case, maybe "Buffer (narrowed)..." would be better. Another >> possibility (shorter): >> >> Narrowed/total: 112/1135 lines, 673/6894 words, 6074/70452 chars > > If I've narrowed a very large buffer to a small region, I am not interested in > the counts for the entire buffer nor willing to wait for them. Agreed. I committed the simplest version, i.e. reporting "Narrowed part of buffer" in the message. I'll leave this open in case as a wishlist item; if anyone wants to implement the more complicated reporting with C-u, feel free.