From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dual licensing of Org manual? Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 06:43:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87txrnkgyr.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87hanpwpm8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <876244myt7.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <89ip84k0qf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355550241 4711 80.91.229.3 (15 Dec 2012 05:44:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 05:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, sdelafond@gmx.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 15 06:44:15 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TjkXn-0001wg-7E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 06:44:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51110 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjkXa-0005xf-2Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57730) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjkXX-0005xR-UC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:44:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjkXX-000766-0v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:43:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:37676) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjkXW-000761-Qt; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:43:58 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t49so1930624wey.0 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:43:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=5x9kWGIqi3rmMulGxdKLPPl34jBh8bIGQh+r1ki/3po=; b=K2U0yyUDEFixgFVq1LRcTvzRxUm7AFWyNhv1+WVAKerMqyOSTIux4nTqqrX7lMptJ7 1yYhJbMr3oLr92fyVO1fsbi3DLZ/vtAbgnaVKiiXfriM568E96WXuYStQdZ475QAH9k4 sASExAaXBGVRKcwESBbsyqbMmi/DCdrlRNl/Al46GdOksOi0DLUFJiweXYNn9HrnM2BI 8QOxK+M3l5ghZc2ZUV0WGwPPLpnvCV3wvLYJuEkuWYhev5ga87pcUnJ7zWK4kyI6Rhfm oB06tyf/GqPqjbwLEmm046XbeQuwX26en4LOTyYwsVR13xjaTQb7KyApD7zl18Wn14ZZ uizw== Original-Received: by 10.194.21.70 with SMTP id t6mr7002589wje.42.1355550237293; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:43:57 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o3sm615883wic.0.2012.12.14.21.43.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:43:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B41C422425; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 06:43:56 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <89ip84k0qf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:22:16 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 74.125.82.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155567 Archived-At: Hi Glenn, Glenn Morris writes: > Bastien wrote: > >> The notice in version 7.9.2 of the Org manual* says: > [...] >> A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free >> Documentation License." > > This was untrue (there was no such section). I added one. Thanks. Also done for org.texi and orgguide.texi in our git repo. >> This document is part of a collection distributed under the GNU Free >> Documentation License. If you want to distribute this document >> separately from the collection, you can do so by adding a copy of the >> license to the document, as described in section 6 of the license. > > This was logially inconsistent with the above. I removed it. Indeed, thanks. -- Bastien