From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Guerry Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13824: 24.3.50; :package-version not taking priority over :version Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:28:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87txozc7c4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361914446 1533 80.91.229.3 (26 Feb 2013 21:34:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:34:06 +0000 (UTC) To: 13824@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 26 22:34:29 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UASAO-0004xk-Ur for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:34:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35732 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UASA4-00049x-4G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:34:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46902) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UASA0-00049h-1N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:34:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAS9x-0002kc-DJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:34:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46242) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAS5M-0000Mr-Bv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:29:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAS74-0006hh-FB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Bastien Guerry Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 13824 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.136191425225747 (code B ref -1); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2013 21:30:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51706 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAS6u-0006hE-K3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:30:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60996) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAS6s-0006h7-9a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:30:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAS56-0000Ea-Eh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:29:03 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:40789) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAS56-0000EE-60 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:29:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44081) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAS53-00016g-U8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:29:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAS52-0000Ag-8A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:28:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]:42097) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAOL8-0003un-Hk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:29:18 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hm6so4987231wib.8 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:29:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:subject:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; bh=2Jk95xZKQdsM9Btc2N7GM5IvWZRP8mubXnKqefQoJ38=; b=IscBd6LR6zyS915Gg/1YnafpISozXdV2l+uAoUTCyx+TP9dM9Kbz6paPpWGGwdlyQf EDkf1pOdPyhmsiRFnHg1aM88ckU09CPltz1O9HqOHxFHxmYt8SvUKUq3UDz9yaWLNPjF rv/WWwIovFNSPPfsOdYj1AN3Rh3jUVFf09aYfI2U2/5JolthIK+MKXDJfL3Py5uVYASf ha2Qu/odmI9zxHGaQwq7i8sTUt0We1oDn4wgNX2mNXcvOa651YeK04muqETcMcpNca+t fM0RDIMuObxbi4P+zNkW52b+Mno+ym/T0RqenGCD1dbjNwZOSUlMS/306uHL59b67L0A 0+tg== X-Received: by 10.180.84.165 with SMTP id a5mr21016717wiz.6.1361899757789; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:29:17 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (128-79-136-150.hfc.dyn.abo.bbox.fr. [128.79.136.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q13sm27367436wie.0.2013.02.26.09.29.13 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:29:16 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0D13A1C206CA; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:28:59 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:71866 Archived-At: The docstring of `defcustom' says: :package-version VALUE should be a list with the form (PACKAGE . VERSION) specifying that the variable was first introduced, or its default value was changed, in PACKAGE version VERSION. This keyword takes priority over :version. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ but `describe-variable-custom-version-info' gives priority to :version over :package-version. Which one is correct here? Thanks!