From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Using glib's g_file_monitor_file and g_file_monitor_directory Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 16:09:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87txllaneq.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87zjxxn6th.fsf@gmx.de> <87hajqpjn1.fsf@gmx.de> <8738t7pewc.fsf@gmx.de> <51A4C2E9.8040000@cs.ucla.edu> <83d2sbp1ao.fsf@gnu.org> <51A4D4FE.2020202@cs.ucla.edu> <87y5axaogx.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1369836584 25317 80.91.229.3 (29 May 2013 14:09:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 14:09:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Paul Eggert , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 29 16:09:43 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uhh4Q-0005ne-SD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 16:09:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59181 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uhh4Q-0001gi-Ax for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 10:09:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42172) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uhh41-0001Cg-9i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 10:09:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uhh3w-0004pS-0p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 10:09:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:65460) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uhh3v-0004pD-Ng for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 10:09:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.10]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M2rpw-1UOeLA25eI-00seTn for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 16:09:10 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 May 2013 14:09:10 -0000 Original-Received: from p5DCA31B8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO detlef.gmx.de) [93.202.49.184] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 29 May 2013 16:09:10 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18t+R9gHRAtMXdpH5UMfUFSHCLGeJSqot47uduXRB iewNMsLYfMo7sm In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 29 May 2013 10:03:05 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:159886 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> I believe all events which are not raised by an user action (keyboard, >> mouse, etc) shall be handled by such a separate queue. Currently, >> TIMER_EVENT, BUFFER_SWITCH_EVENT, DBUS_EVENT and FILE_NOTIFY_EVENT would >> fall into this category. Maybe also USER_SIGNAL_EVENT. > > I'm not sure I'd put BUFFER_SWITCH_EVENT in there, but I agree about the > other ones. I haven't used it yet, but the doc in termhooks.h says BUFFER_SWITCH_EVENT, /* A process filter has switched buffers. */ This doesn't sound like triggered by a user action. > Stefan Best regards, Michael.