From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [RFC] Slight change to asynchronous export Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 09:35:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87txg0cw5g.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87fvrnawes.fsf@gmail.com> <8761shs3ab.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vb4lL-0005qj-KX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 04:35:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vb4lG-0005Fg-3z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 04:34:55 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]:33207) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vb4lF-0005FS-TA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 04:34:50 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id ez12so4794093wid.5 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 01:34:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8761shs3ab.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Mon, 28 Oct 2013 18:39:40 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Achim Gratz writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> At the moment, by default, external emacs process for asynchronous >> export is called with: >> >> /path/to/emacs -Q --batch -l org-export-async-init-file ... export stuff... >> >> where `org-export-async-init-file' defaults to `user-init-file'. It is, >> by default, not the same as calling "emacs", because of the "-Q". > > That's a good thing, I'd say. There is a lot of stuff going on in init > files that you most likely don't want done when firing Emacs off in the > background. That is especially true of some site-init files that you > typically have no control over. As I said, it wouldn't be worse than the current situation. > If you don't make this the default then no harm is done, I guess. The whole point of this change is to change the default value. If there's no interest in it, I won't bother making it. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou