From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs completion matches selection UI Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:46:45 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87txe4he5m.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> References: <87fvqtg02v.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87txf0390n.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87y53komex.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87haa8moh6.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <874n67n450.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87eh5bkxca.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87d2kuzzqj.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87a9fylusq.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <878uvizrwz.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <8761qmkyn1.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87zjnyxdpb.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87k3f2j7xv.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <2518D79A-B9E4-45DF-A403-8330145DFD17@gmail.com> <87wqj1xwzc.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <6E27E6FD-4FB8-4342-BB66-1B62E22DDF4F@gmail.com> <87txe5xqyc.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83ioukbuwj.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387479015 6439 80.91.229.3 (19 Dec 2013 18:50:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 18:50:15 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 19 19:50:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vtifs-0005E8-BR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 19:50:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45855 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vtifs-0003nV-0G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:50:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47395) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vtifk-0003lk-35 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:50:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vtife-0004Lx-4p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:50:12 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:34303) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vtifd-0004Ku-Uj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:50:06 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vtifb-00053P-Af for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 19:50:03 +0100 Original-Received: from c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.229.61.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 19:50:03 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 19:50:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:DdVNHSUHJsGgxYqWswPx0/V2/I0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:166621 Archived-At: On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 19:41:32 +0200 Eli Zaretskii wrote: EZ> Is this discussion about how to compute the candidates, or how to EZ> display them and let the user browse them and select one? I though EZ> the latter was the issue at hand, in which case the algorithms used EZ> to compute the candidates are not part of that issue. The latter. The algorithms and the data backend for completion candidates and for list selection in general are not a problem IMO. Ted