From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: read-event in batch mode Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:43:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87txckgtbk.fsf@gmx.de> References: <831tzo74oz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391175838 22361 80.91.229.3 (31 Jan 2014 13:43:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:43:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 31 14:44:04 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W9EO3-0005HK-PK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:44:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55678 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9EO3-00055y-FI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:44:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35688) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9ENw-00054p-7a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9ENq-0003YS-9o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:43:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:64299) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9ENp-0003Xy-W8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:43:50 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([93.209.86.42]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPS (Nemesis) id 0Mb7lL-1Voff63NbH-00Kisu for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:43:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <831tzo74oz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:48:12 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Ve34Yo06GTiDmdm0snPWEIblesHyRhk2+63emvdN08LWPAtzhoE ixxASDJ7eRmozi32MySI5fNeoIUgxh7nZW0o5H7B7k/2ZKaL1ZiMOC1Twd+0JOn94fjfRi5 qiYqVfe1/hA/3DRfmhPyYXo9p8mf6BQQ8YFD01FRspmva9sosrfWNPFJRnWfzPWfm8w7LxY 0tC4n4GfHJ0QLRVfy4qVA== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169271 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > In any case, I think we need to document this deviant behavior, at > least for now, because there's no hint of it anywhere in the docs. Of > course, sit-for is also affected by that. > > Comments? For 24.4, we shouldn't change it. Documentation might be sufficient (but we must say, that the behaviour is undefined, depending on the configuration options). In general, I believe that events arriving from D-Bus or file change notifications and alike, shouldn't go via the keyboard buffer. Such events shall have their own handling in the main loop. Best regards, Michael.