From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2690: 23.0.91; line spacing with X servers Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 17:09:58 -0800 Message-ID: <87txcdvyft.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391649133 10588 80.91.229.3 (6 Feb 2014 01:12:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 01:12:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2690@debbugs.gnu.org To: Peter Dyballa Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 06 02:12:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WBDVn-00085d-Fc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 02:12:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34012 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBDVn-0008Up-1O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 20:12:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57507) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBDVf-0008Ud-P2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 20:12:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBDVa-0008Pv-As for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 20:12:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBDVa-0008Pr-7w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 20:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBDVa-0000La-1K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 20:12:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 2690 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: unreproducible moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 2690-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B2690.13916490791266 (code B ref 2690); Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2690) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2014 01:11:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51666 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBDUs-0000KL-Ni for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 20:11:19 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:54944) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBDUq-0000KB-QP for 2690@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 20:11:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBDUb-0008DV-PV; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 02:11:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Peter Dyballa's message of "Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:04:36 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WBDUb-0008DV-PV MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392253862.40632@n0+5mLKlJ6DtudYrJ3yCvA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84677 Archived-At: Peter Dyballa writes: > GNU Emacsen 22.x do not show this effect. Today I made two tests: I > first compiled GNU Emacs 22.3 with the X11R7.3 software =96 no effect on > line spacing, in neither X servers, everything's OK. And I compiled > GNU Emacs 23.0.91, updated today, with Apple's X11R6.6 and some > "auxiliary" software (GTK, libs TIFF, JPEG, GIF, PNG, RSVG, XPM) from > X11R6.6 based Fink project (installed in /sw tree). It shows the too > tight line spacing effect in X11R7.3. All use libfontconfig 1 or 2 and > libfreetype. Libotf is not used. The X11R6.6 version does not use > libXft, for which I can't check the cause because the configure.log > file is just a few 100 bytes long. > > I did not check with lsof that the Emacs binaries are really using > those shared libraries they are linked to (I rely on the output of > otool, Apple's ldd command), but I can check upon request. Do you have > an explanation for the X server's behaviour? And also a cure? > > There is another effect in *shell* buffer: just pressing RET on an > empty line positions the cursor in the next line in column 0, at the > beginning of the prompt (%n ! /\ in tcsh) which is customised and not > manipulated by ANSI. This bug report was previously marked "unreproducible". Are you still seeing this problem in Emacs 24.3? --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/