From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6280: 24.0.50; (elisp) Dedicated Windows Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 19:19:23 -0800 Message-ID: <87txc7hcxw.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <4BFEAAE6.60301@gmx.at> <4BFF8A9C.8060700@gmx.at> <804C0F1267E447EE983B0C90E01F1573@us.oracle.com> <4BFFDCD5.90706@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392002472 27701 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2014 03:21:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 03:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6280@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 10 04:21:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WChQr-0002CP-Fo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 04:21:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53097 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WChQq-0004ra-PL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:21:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38515) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WChQi-0004mN-Fu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:21:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WChQd-0003FB-1u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:21:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47350) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WChQc-0003F4-UH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WChQc-00056l-Gm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:21:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 03:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6280 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6280-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6280.139200245619607 (code B ref 6280); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 03:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6280) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2014 03:20:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33133 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WChQW-000569-48 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:20:56 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:56076) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WChQT-000561-VY for 6280@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:20:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WChQC-0004zz-SY; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 04:20:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4BFFDCD5.90706@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Fri, 28 May 2010 17:10:13 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WChQC-0004zz-SY MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392607237.46414@YWtQcGhSe35riRnXPmOlhg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85151 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> Unlike you, I am not trying to redesign Emacs in a bug thread. This bug is about >> better documenting for users the _existing_ feature that you _can_ dedicate a >> window to a buffer. That's not sufficiently clear in the doc. > > Dedicated windows have an entire section in the Elisp manual. What is > not sufficiently clear there? Looks clear enough to me. Closing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/