From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17644: 24.4.50; provide access to all mode-line lighters (e.g. those from C code) Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 22:09:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87twikuqh0.fsf@gnus.org> References: <067c46c8-34b1-4ba7-a5b0-1795e4fc75af@default> <8738frs18w@ristopher.com> <37ba5ef5-1ea0-49fb-a2bd-200d6f33acc6@default> <6d906376-5967-49d2-93e7-825322d3c4e0@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461960652 22543 80.91.229.3 (29 Apr 2016 20:10:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 20:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17644@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 29 22:10:44 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1awEkJ-0003CL-PQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 22:10:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56128 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awEkF-00068E-Sr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:10:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37728) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awEjw-0005Y5-LN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:10:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awEjk-0002Jz-VX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:10:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awEjk-0002HA-TE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:10:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awEjh-0001f1-HY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:10:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 20:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17644 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17644-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17644.14619605766329 (code B ref 17644); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 20:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17644) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2016 20:09:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55892 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awEjH-0001e1-PJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:09:35 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:50207) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awEjG-0001du-Ny for 17644@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:09:35 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awEjE-0002Kf-BD; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 22:09:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <6d906376-5967-49d2-93e7-825322d3c4e0@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 30 May 2014 16:37:10 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:117256 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: >> I didn't realize there was a separate % construct just for `Narrow'. >> >> Is `Narrow' the only such "abnormal" lighter implemented in C? >> If so then I will close this bug. > > Actually, no. I would also like to be able to keep `%n' and its > behavior, and use alternative text instead of " Narrow". I think you can just create a new one that has the same behaviour and a new text? So I don't think there's anything to fix here. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no