From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Live System User Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23927: 25.0.94; Errors when updating using package.el Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:21:23 -0400 Message-ID: <87twfu363w.fsf@aol.com> References: <87mvlrphs0.fsf@aol.com> <83twfzgtx6.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1468358601 16766 80.91.229.3 (12 Jul 2016 21:23:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 21:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23927@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 12 23:23:10 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bN594-0001OQ-CO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 23:23:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43639 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bN593-0005Xd-De for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:23:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37553) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bN583-0004T4-Qk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:22:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bN57y-0007kn-QT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:22:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36496) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bN57y-0007kj-My for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bN57y-0000UZ-J7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Live System User Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 21:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23927 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23927-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23927.14683584931838 (code B ref 23927); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 21:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23927) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2016 21:21:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48831 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bN57V-0000TZ-97 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:21:33 -0400 Original-Received: from omr-m007e.mx.aol.com ([204.29.186.9]:49405) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bN57T-0000TN-5f for 23927@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:21:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout-mca02.mx.aol.com (mtaout-mca02.mx.aol.com [172.26.221.78]) by omr-m007e.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id ED8B938000BA; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:21:25 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-50-163-96-131.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [50.163.96.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaout-mca02.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id 8570F3800008D; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:21:25 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83twfzgtx6.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 09 Jul 2016 10:19:33 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.94 (gnu/linux) x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1468358485; bh=J14zxK1ytGoEATxlRsxrCIijphcMxQ9wXDb2pRtXNFs=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=2O9gXY9J8Meo7W8C+8KE6KIp16YpPsCwPB0NIatNIb7co+mZEswgInw2FKiLqA7df SbqK2iv79u54ZavWUEIKg50ty2kyY2oRA1U0/mf8tXkm9bkVCBLxvE3CDS9KnKNy6i m9fjFeRb588oCLtyOf3dGZtn4zkFKNqCgXpmCjOE= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1add4e57855f552f39 X-AOL-IP: 50.163.96.131 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:120964 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Live System User >> Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2016 00:17:03 -0400 >>=20 >> When updating a package `(package-menu-mark-upgrades)', >> I got the following errors/warnings: >>=20 >> package-activate-1: Required feature =E2=80=98info=E2=80=99 was not prov= ided > > A recipe to reproduce this will be appreciated. 0. In .emacs: (add-to-list 'package-archives '(("melpa" . "https://melpa.org/packages/"))) (setq package-user-dir (expand-file-name "~/.emacs.d/elpa")) 1. M-x package-list-packages 2. I then typed "U" which executes `package-menu-mark-upgrades' 3. I then typed "x" which executes `package-menu-execute' to upgrade all installed packages, if any upgrades are available There was one package upgrade available. I then got the errors I am reporting. > The 'info' feature > comes with Emacs, so the only way I could understand how this can > happen is that somehow load-path doesn't include the standard > directories when this code is run. But why and how could that happen? No idea. > >> Invalid face reference: package-status-builtin-face >> Invalid face reference: package-status-builtin-face [3 times] > > A typo? From package.el: > > (defface package-status-built-in > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > '((t :inherit font-lock-builtin-face)) > "Face used on the status and version of built-in packages." > :version "25.1") > > (defface package-status-external > '((t :inherit package-status-builtin-face)) > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > "Face used on the status and version of external packages." > :version "25.1") > > Would package.el gurus please take a look at this? These sound like > very basic problems in package.el, so I'd hate to release 25.1 with > them. Thanks.