From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Bug: org-ellipsis face not applied correctly [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ /usr/share/emacs/25.1/lisp/org/)] Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2016 21:44:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87twclxq73.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35614) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btK1W-0007zc-DQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 15:44:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btK1S-0000Gu-2O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 15:44:37 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:46794) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btK1R-0000Fz-SK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 15:44:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Vasilij Schneidermann's message of "Tue, 4 Oct 2016 07:10:26 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Vasilij Schneidermann Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Vasilij Schneidermann writes: > In Emacs 24.5, folded content was displayed with a distinctly colored > ellipsis. I was somewhat bothered why its appearance could not be > styled by customizing the org-ellipsis face, but did not bother figuring > out at that time. In Emacs 25.1 however, the ellipsis has the same face > as the preceding element, be it a headline or a cookie. Judging from > the code, the org-ellipsis face has never been used, rather the old > behavior happened to be dependent on how Emacs decides to handle buffer > display table slots without any specified face. > > That being said, would it make sense to default to the default or > org-ellipsis face if none is specified? Or alternatively, to drop the > face argument and always use the org-ellipsis face, then let the user > customize it? I did the latter. The current situation was confusing. Thank you for the report. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou