From: Dima Kogan <dima@secretsauce.net>
To: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza@udel.edu>,
25105@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net,
Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
Subject: bug#25105: 26.0.50; diff navigation is broken
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 17:20:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tw9dc7bk.fsf@secretsauce.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87inpt6lce.fsf@gmail.com>
Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com> writes:
> Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza@udel.edu> writes:
>
>> I am guessing this is a consequence of bug#17544. From -Q:
>>
>> 1. Do C-x v d RET = in a repository with a bunch of worktree changes
>> 2. Hit n. Point is now at the top of the SECOND hunk
>> 3. Go to end of buffer.
>> 4. Hit p. Point is now at the top of the PENULTIMATE hunk
> FWIW, to me this behaviour is very annoying and it has being
> around already a while without a fix (4 months).
> I would propose to revert the commit causing this misbehaviour.
> Then, once the patch is mature enough, it can be pushed again without
> affecting users.
Hi.
This isn't a misbehavior, it's the whole point of the patch. We can
argue about whether it's an improvement or not, but if this is a "bug",
then the solution is a full revert.
The behavior I want is to always have a consistent idea of which hunk we
are currently on. In the recipe above, between steps 1 and 2 the point
is at bob. Both before and after the patch, the codes agree that we are
on the hunk 1. When you press 'n', I thus argue you should end up at
hunk 2. Similary, when you press C-c C-a; it should apply the first
hunk, and move to the second. And so on. What would you like?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-06 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-04 15:13 bug#25105: 26.0.50; diff navigation is broken Mark Oteiza
2016-12-04 15:27 ` npostavs
2016-12-05 15:38 ` Dima Kogan
2016-12-05 15:53 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-12-05 16:33 ` Dima Kogan
2016-12-05 16:55 ` Mark Oteiza
2016-12-05 17:49 ` Dima Kogan
2016-12-25 6:57 ` Dima Kogan
2016-12-25 13:54 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-01-06 1:14 ` Tino Calancha
2017-01-06 1:20 ` Dima Kogan [this message]
2017-01-06 1:27 ` Dima Kogan
2017-01-06 3:06 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-01-06 3:50 ` Tino Calancha
2017-01-06 4:16 ` Dima Kogan
2017-01-06 4:43 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-01-06 7:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-01-06 8:03 ` Tino Calancha
2017-01-06 14:14 ` Dmitry Gutov
2017-01-07 1:54 ` Tino Calancha
2017-01-07 2:05 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-01-07 9:51 ` Dima Kogan
2017-01-07 11:16 ` Tino Calancha
2017-01-07 22:16 ` Dima Kogan
2017-01-07 22:27 ` Dmitry Gutov
2017-01-06 3:09 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-01-06 4:22 ` Tino Calancha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tw9dc7bk.fsf@secretsauce.net \
--to=dima@secretsauce.net \
--cc=25105@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=dgutov@yandex.ru \
--cc=mvoteiza@udel.edu \
--cc=npostavs@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tino.calancha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.