From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about test failure on Hydra Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:20:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87tw1t7yk5.fsf@rosalinde> References: <87efsxexf5.fsf@rosalinde> <83r2wx29w9.fsf@gnu.org> <8760e9eksb.fsf@rosalinde> <83ini91e2o.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1501492841 19691 195.159.176.226 (31 Jul 2017 09:20:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 09:20:41 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 31 11:20:35 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dc6sE-0004Pq-OB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:20:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58270 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dc6sK-0000AI-HM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 05:20:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60796) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dc6s8-00008X-HO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 05:20:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dc6s7-0000gF-F9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 05:20:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:51200) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dc6s1-0000XF-Ld; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 05:20:13 -0400 Original-Received: from rosalinde ([83.135.0.148]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M3igT-1dtmLS0iw5-00rDwG; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:20:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83ini91e2o.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 31 Jul 2017 06:26:55 +0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:yekcWA2H1Z148Bs9RPnaJesecKWV8m6lSQBk4bFpWGBJ7sLbc8+ o5oVue+kGbAZs2bTMtRmXSBAsdNiE7DafCfc+ANNz7L/Kys9fvdXSwFcYhD+Bp3xbrHSGLF Sw7OHGhE+VaYy8YYfC4D7G32zoG6MjuMRg1X8m7wLIk6hRx27Xsrin7pEmmyVyT6RbPAphm SLSaZCm+f39mcGhGkp6Kw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:t+xgRmuWPxc=:iw61Mh5oulo/idzRauRsD/ mxAeooILl6ng+26oLlqXEKmPEW0B3JcGv16bpDWfCoY5AAaicIb8xzUhBVYXEhgLtrh4USrwz N4YTQeT6dEQTH71UAkVBQVTMZWoQUvEngk3jESLarPa2KU1PjEo83HqNklE/55/9WFrVETbqw VQH2kHbv7lJeSXPQb5SPEcZMFyeHMYJpySW6D/q1qc0NP20msLwnqP5fAvGlniU7N4TdROk9B LCs8kkfO4MMU7fJ3LU3rBAE7QfkogjQxk/wP3uGbvnaLk24SeLKmcTUpZ8VvGBCiafT4hwbMt yHPuF8MmvOU/kzHb98Lv4O4lVYngd2kYgtR6LRy2gUFUpQQGbPcmFr96EytxoFsoXuA8Tc/kd gl1+1MWTsIqmxmn2e4iLKjcoeTqo3VEbU9zXXNOfPHyZYfCiXe76yQ8YKllS1qx42XsbFBpJc Rfk6y0mTsySEnPvpc90FMQBT9uJ+AsbzbSnU0qqeULxjZPNHtdDex65Jnd/dg9YGDGCm5sAPv sEbstBb6EH7Zu4BIcjAdVsB16SraBR66sVHoGU4U+tUXZG1TFvkkZubvqEoWW/z65WGZpMmQL PZaIg2/pqsc0GtqJvEm4kGsoaipWc/UUYn0JVloO5hCVc35H0nHzTBSzuQ+JiK5Lm4OxmEs5G vATtRjqvn7ZuJ50spPgsTxvNcbQY736i4SylTCnRm4ayMCnGx9xF9ovNz3dBnOcDvd1X73Yqd lN491cJUC/cltDTmX0SSKd+O4HLBimM+GP9bmhoaHi7JVoZsu9BHzyNlCupmt7C16hSLmC2R X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:217180 Archived-At: On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 06:26:55 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> But the sexp (dired test-dir) should (and in all my test runs does) >> put point on the first "nontrivial" file (i.e. it skips "." and >> ".."). > > In your case, does (dired test-dir) reads the directory anew, or does > it revert an existing Dired buffer? I think the place to look for the > problem depends on the answer to this question. (dired test-dir) reverts an existing Dired buffer, because of setting dired-auto-revert-buffer to t. (When I step through the code, it is after reverting that point moves to the subdirectory line, which the should make "sanity check" true (and does, both when I step through the code and just run the test in any way). When I comment out the dired-auto-revert-buffer line, then point stays at point-min, which makes the sanity check fail (dired-file-name-at-point returns nil), though not in the way Hydra reports (it shows point being on the ".." entry).) Steve Berman