Re: Summary and next steps for (package-initialize)

[Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza@udel.edu>]

Radon Rosborough <radon.neon@gmail.com> writes:
> Last week I posted an inquiry [1] about package.el's auto-insertion of
> code into the init-file. Six people weighed in, but no definitive
> conclusion was reached. I would like to propose concrete next steps,
> summarizing relevant parts of the discussion in the process.

Thanks for pushing the issue.

> ==> The proposal
>
> The `package--ensure-init-file' logic will be removed

+1 for reverting.

I will happily propose and write documentation for various use cases of
package.el, but I will not waste my time as long as the current solution
is in place.