From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28652: 26.0.60; Display often "flashes" due to double buffering when switching to Emacs frames Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 15:07:41 -0400 Message-ID: <87tvzk0zuq.fsf@moondust.localdomain> References: <87377573ac.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <59CF5683.9010807@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1506798493 22089 195.159.176.226 (30 Sep 2017 19:08:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 19:08:13 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cc: 28652@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 30 21:08:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dyN7N-00058S-3I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 21:08:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40138 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyN7U-0001vA-Gu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 15:08:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41801) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyN7O-0001us-QV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 15:08:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyN7K-0007Po-CO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 15:08:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60998) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyN7K-0007Pg-6l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 15:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dyN7J-0005UT-UI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 15:08:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 19:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28652 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28652-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28652.150679847121087 (code B ref 28652); Sat, 30 Sep 2017 19:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28652) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Sep 2017 19:07:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41446 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dyN79-0005U3-EF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 15:07:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f177.google.com ([209.85.223.177]:53947) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dyN76-0005Tn-FH for 28652@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 15:07:49 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f177.google.com with SMTP id q11so2124443ioe.10 for <28652@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 12:07:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=mCWT1C2TKXGoxHRKVR2PVZAlMrfTMqhlNvKssXxif1g=; b=XSTb2tZYnbIa8TiXHp9FnH0ZWQzc4A+Jyx8cK2OfWci6AkjNMFjM36tnQclJxHxxDM 55Z9aDz0mRpk8umAkxiMbqcAr6Vtu7Io52gPrttIyKRSulXb/uCb5C/O8LZrnq2mv2B2 BkivA/8b3NPYs03GMNYds/cHdI35aQWXsow9+BcbxcpepQD1IzuHF9LNs8SWUALRDOEI RqtczJ0+v7Ka6f2J1wWBrHUnb/5Im93OK0cgYEnZtLqgBN3EyETRXHvgTmb1XZWYSM35 k2Kam8IRxIrBjlEcb/bueBDeIohIYTY50/1hcmaYgjS+XqaiW3shbB50ioP+ABUD1lxf xOvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=mCWT1C2TKXGoxHRKVR2PVZAlMrfTMqhlNvKssXxif1g=; b=FEUbLokXPDBOwer4fwX8ZWsnpiUWFdYWx6+8PXQoxgmKyjdkOx12ELgN28qCk88Jis DxY1YgaGeCTLFsmyeg4pHxLc8JmmszhWF/z7HeP5qWVps9/ci7wlYj1YmWvr9ue01nsU QLTTF+8c4couix2qvjR8Oda4NoOY/sK765MIKhnxmV0CaY59mTp0v5tqTJgOB3KtjOFR MZv6PdppcVyOFCtg8I9LHzloJWzUMH4GCUbv0GUUDlVAgDxmNsI9AsNHgbSPgmeZWtmW uGPt5zT+J58JMMY0p0+cSs5bL7Jupa3AdMNTbyaGhuaLIGDwuHkZ/ECiVUuj91fsLiwY VDyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaV4KHulGNY/U0YSPTDfs/JrMnfvkqMpTzvXaeEgngMzxQJEzDzW OlTbxtPYkwHzC43ndLp2xbN0SA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCACI+2Dc5ay8+3Yw/BbcTTjp7ns3nt5k4IMaqMuTk3ra8pZIAt2FWS4gGELqVIbZbErnPn8g== X-Received: by 10.107.7.78 with SMTP id 75mr18474260ioh.298.1506798462781; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 12:07:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from moondust.localdomain.nodomain.none ([72.143.113.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s132sm2925109iod.2.2017.09.30.12.07.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 30 Sep 2017 12:07:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <59CF5683.9010807@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:32:03 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:137705 Archived-At: At 10:32 +0200 on Saturday 2017-09-30, martin rudalics wrote: > >> In GNU Emacs 26.0.60 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.17) >> of 2017-09-24 built on moondust.localdomain > > If this happened for a build of master in between commits > > c0af83b6ccf2dab9a515dd7f52eb9d4500275ae3 > > and > > 2fa19cc5510cdbf00c54991a9959be984dd99fbe > > it would imply that inhibiting double buffering is also needed > even if it did not cause problems like those from bug#28589. But > apparently you built from the release branch. So I'm slightly > confused. > > martin Hi Martin, Sorry, I don't know if I can help with your confusion. Yes, I built from the release branch (emacs-26) on 2017-09-24 at commit d93301242f38d3d9aaa55899c07496f0bdecf391. The commits you mention were made 2017-08-27 and 2017-09-26 respectively, but neither of them seem to be in the emacs-26 branch. I am not familiar with bug#28589. N.