From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18059: 24.3.92; defvar and special variables Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:00:27 -0500 Message-ID: <87tvts11n8.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ha2c7lxy.fsf@web.de> <87mv0gbq33.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87y3k0bdm9.fsf@web.de> <87inb4bbse.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <873727bkud.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87efloa000.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87fu5y53w5.fsf@gmail.com> <87371xlpmw.fsf@web.de> <87a7w2m1cb.fsf@web.de> <874lm7u554.fsf@web.de> <878tb72zgl.fsf@gmail.com> <87vaeazw77.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1520427813 25602 195.159.176.226 (7 Mar 2018 13:03:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 13:03:33 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: 18059@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 07 14:03:29 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1etYj7-0005Xh-54 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 14:03:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33168 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1etYl9-00078I-NK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:05:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56348) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1etYgu-0003rZ-PT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:01:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1etYgp-000344-8v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:01:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1etYgp-000340-55 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:01:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1etYgn-0002C2-Vj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:01:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 13:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18059 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 18059-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18059.15204276356514 (code B ref 18059); Wed, 07 Mar 2018 13:01:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18059) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2018 13:00:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48547 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1etYgN-0001gm-FO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:00:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f51.google.com ([209.85.214.51]:34865) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1etYgM-0001Z3-DT for 18059@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 08:00:34 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f51.google.com with SMTP id v194so3299422itb.0 for <18059@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 05:00:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=xm7CAFtgoDTAkQ5Enicdftn/s6cMi3T17qcHZqydlN4=; b=kCyd8Kpn+VBOmmoCwjJqj6MkOJp2Ob6CNqqpL6nQaGPHT3+OAP0TUpSM+Otkm08wE5 ODZ7/eayoKYafSeWoUMAmfnUsKWCQf5RBqZB19lIdISZXlnbJFeu0csCJpaNB8AvzDBz Zyd4CQxvzL21gTjbQq1dTWrtDZlTWgAmFUlUl2ey6jEEVLbtXHejSM94JSUTAyQXgjh2 Y15Y1+YG5T0rGctGsATpqN9SqQqOhAZ+KuoknrwW/1RWGyqdny91U/DR219CNK1SRHgi QN34Um7gd4sbV5Z4iM2jYpGPy5oEoWG0nYGKfXdiFu2s1bPHU54CYWhvmwmoO/CP+lAT B6/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=xm7CAFtgoDTAkQ5Enicdftn/s6cMi3T17qcHZqydlN4=; b=DyjkG4PUZ77Nz9gpjz+i1bzcF2ipWWImwTaiVGRIDcRr+Cd/9Olhf5kdw+6plka6/q XoJ2zhMA5oBVggK2PW+mR+HTHCzdFEjLGqrnh1zrS1azkshjqdpeqA1FUwwfEIfYeVBw b1frdv8/9Hiv/5i+xXE30dOLe7xboLiDDvYpmuPf51nLOmqNbn/f7LtH8UucNBG4MoxT lblUHrzTBD44zLudEi/3IQybJqPYAIrYp4BZqGQDTKdz3JyJJQ+uCvPo2QrOEdOOn9Yz qWocs24ITMA2ecG2iEoSCk6W496+sNa+8CXkGQhb/uKO7IaSd5P5WRw6KSJHPyB9XTGD WNrA== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7GpcYFekrWTYmSXrPXR7w//0I6IqHP5+JJMZLZ2TtGiSRU6hOuE PUhR4hN8TQIjCNUOjUCi6aU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsoQFv1/CFNWBmRY+p73ziXs27Gqd9QQAz1QS/lWjexY+7iP8qm2Vrjca8ksW9alroIx8ye0A== X-Received: by 10.36.135.195 with SMTP id f186mr23719412ite.100.1520427628960; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 05:00:28 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z84sm8716110itf.21.2018.03.07.05.00.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Mar 2018 05:00:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87vaeazw77.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Mon, 05 Mar 2018 10:51:56 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:143977 Archived-At: Michael Heerdegen writes: >> +variable as special, i.e.@: dynamically bound, but only for the rest >> +of the current binding form, or file if at top-level.) > > Maybe we can be more precise than "current binding form" - "lexical > environment" maybe? Hmm, how would that work? I don't think "the rest of the lexical environment" makes sense. So maybe dynamically bound, until the current lexical environment ends, or file if at top-level.)