From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13764: 24.3.50; please do not use defsubst for `font-lock-(apply-highlight|fontify-anchored-keywords)' Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 13:45:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87tv7qv1u8.fsf@gnus.org> References: <220CC265C06944E69F89E1F29796C873@us.oracle.com> <87lh3x2wnn.fsf@gnus.org> <090ab034-aeeb-432e-b597-a138c5c13efa@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="183036"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 13764@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 30 13:47:03 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iPnNP-000lU7-QT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 13:47:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40140 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iPnNO-0002nT-Lk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39021) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iPnMR-0002SE-By for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:46:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iPnMQ-0003Ux-7i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40623) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iPnMQ-0003UN-4W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iPnMP-0008Ve-W7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:46:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13764 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 13764-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13764.157243954232667 (code B ref 13764); Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2019 12:45:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49440 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iPnM6-0008Un-Ah for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:45:42 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:55856) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iPnM3-0008Ud-RK for 13764@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:45:41 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iPnLz-0005wN-HZ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 13:45:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <090ab034-aeeb-432e-b597-a138c5c13efa@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:17:25 -0700 (PDT)") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:170406 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: >> > I see no reason why these function should not be defuns. >> >> Presumably they are that way because of efficiency concerns. Have you >> done benchmarking to compare the impact of these defsubsts turning into >> defuns? > > Oh come on. Why such a presumption? Did you look at the code? I take that as a "no", and I'm closing this bug report as a "wontfix". -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no