From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Sergey Organov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40097: 28.0.50; Preferred font ignored for specific charset Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:12:47 +0300 Message-ID: <87tv2kr428.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> References: <87r1xriovt.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> <831rprgg2g.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv2narke.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> <83wo7jey86.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfnxg2ik.fsf@gnu.org> <83d099frx8.fsf@gnu.org> <834kulf2ks.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="129742"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 40097-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 19 12:13:13 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jEt6v-000Xdp-8s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:13:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36238 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jEt6u-0003lR-Ao for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 07:13:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36719) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jEt6l-0003ix-OQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 07:13:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEt6k-0002ru-M0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 07:13:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35879) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEt6k-0002ro-IB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 07:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jEt6k-0000fs-Cd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 07:13:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sergey Organov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 11:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40097 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40097-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D40097.15846163772581 (code D ref 40097); Thu, 19 Mar 2020 11:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40097-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Mar 2020 11:12:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41852 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jEt6e-0000fZ-Q9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 07:12:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-f173.google.com ([209.85.208.173]:38219) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jEt6c-0000fL-U2 for 40097-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 07:12:55 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-f173.google.com with SMTP id w1so1977995ljh.5 for <40097-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 04:12:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=tzs03mIXDLQCEShNmaS2dOWtEMTk4jSPc28ef8whgEg=; b=txurj2N70p44QbirlwhSa6ocBuNeB8B5EOzfNf0ElWv7dZqVlW7DQoYSG46/PMpZc2 UFgzGdSFQM4FLPJuVLWrNizQ/5ZdSIxON3xKm6cHz97QSoCBcxXwBGBA5Z3bHwxi9fDy R4WjWfLDblzkhJpEpbDZigg7URolIc6kxpVqt/q6PfPEWvhUhKrIO65D/LnfT8G6DPpD U3d8yN6WNvlrLoUHGUwhC8OszxkKqZUKeK0BBXgTF2D2LcZTyd8ty9PJbewm6dnDasYM 57eXdieSMcJrqKjiSW758D/tjs5QG4pbUEy8fNyXJE35WMLVF4sxEXXnmJdP2IeOiVld feRw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=tzs03mIXDLQCEShNmaS2dOWtEMTk4jSPc28ef8whgEg=; b=piVAxyYxzrAbVvF1nxxrIoa5Z2sIrLydeOJNDKIYGxCZloYq/TvO56EPd+KyKc7Hx1 SFAwvhR3VOrRMMrit6lnJoGnlEGVSw4FCaf8X5gE4vwtDPorlR5WEVgs+fakTiEuQUzA ycnL5Zq1f4eGKep5n+GXjiOymbiJjpK4rV8NLCe/CayN1CYkceZw6DTMG7yTH+97FcR5 Rsog0WtBtiWK0/rvkqpH19V2SPio9wpLA3xy/MFJp81EQik0XFGmub7vFBgcbfPKfDtZ XJSoeAUTdzCad3NDoe1pPpQkEZn1IWhK9xE/gHZAUIapE2lNioBY3B7scNbRdSlwOJEP 6eWg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2X379cs1OrWcE3m/LYFHf6KAU3PlSZYHVjt2JCoMCU13+gPzxi 4XZuyJ1vr5g6ktHrSokbqlkgPlV8 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vu5R0tl8XPHYbIzyjKhIb5bsATPEST6ftPmcGT3nXZKuoUGQmI9kQ+1HZTAtqZCxp54G5o+PA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9681:: with SMTP id q1mr1915414lji.179.1584616368690; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 04:12:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from osv.localdomain ([89.175.180.246]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f8sm1267990lfc.10.2020.03.19.04.12.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 19 Mar 2020 04:12:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Robert Pluim's message of "Thu, 19 Mar 2020 09:26:10 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:177540 Archived-At: Robert Pluim writes: >>>>>> On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 05:25:39 +0200, Eli Zaretskii said: > > >> From: Robert Pluim > >> Cc: sorganov@gmail.com, 40097@debbugs.gnu.org > >> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 21:47:19 +0100 > >> > >> >> So correcting the name of the registry in ftfont.c fixes this. > >> > Eli> You mean, fixing that makes DejaVu Sans Mono be used in this case? > >> > >> Yes. > >> > Eli> That's great, let's fix this in emacs-27 then. > >> > >> If you want me to be conservative, I could *add* a microsoft-cp1251 > >> entry instead of replacing windows-1251, but as far as I know > >> windows-1251 is not a valid registry name. > > Eli> I see no need to add it, this registry value cannot be used much, or > Eli> we'd have many bug reports about this problem long ago. Let's just > Eli> replace the incorrect value with the correct one. > > Done for emacs-27 in bed04c502c > > Closing. Good job! Thanks a lot to both of you for taking care of this! -- Sergey