From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tomas Hlavaty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:35:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87tuuwojdg.fsf@logand.com> References: <864kmzupp0.fsf@akirakyle.com> <835z7e2ouj.fsf@gnu.org> <86v9fet5sg.fsf@akirakyle.com> <87o8l6geh1.fsf@logand.com> <86h7qxu8ko.fsf@gmail.com> <877drtqn2w.fsf@logand.com> <83mu0ozw8r.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34785"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 14 18:37:34 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kSjmP-0008uW-0A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:37:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35620 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSjmK-000519-QN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:37:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSjkv-0003bQ-LW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: from logand.com ([37.48.87.44]:49096) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSjkt-0005fY-MV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: by logand.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8F3F619FD07; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:35:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: emacs 26.3 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) In-Reply-To: <83mu0ozw8r.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=37.48.87.44; envelope-from=tom@logand.com; helo=logand.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/14 12:35:58 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:257656 Archived-At: On Wed 14 Oct 2020 at 18:02, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > That sounds somewhat harsh. Let's try being kinder to people who come > up with ideas for improving Emacs, okay? i was simply trying to be as clear as possible. sorry if it sounded harsh. it wasn't suppose to be and it is not clear to me why you think it sounded harsh.