From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ai_flags in calls to getaddrinfo, broader call for reproducibility check Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 21:19:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87turn2plc.fsf@gmail.com> References: <83sg7mggls.fsf@gnu.org> <83czymc8nq.fsf@gnu.org> <74b7a0a9-0eb3-7944-19d2-f72424ee72d7@dasyatidae.com> <83eeirfqbo.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8hvscfi.fsf@gmail.com> <87wnwjuv5j.fsf@tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4912"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 11 21:21:46 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kz3hC-0001Bf-MI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 21:21:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36060 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kz3hB-0004pV-MV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:21:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kz3fZ-0004EC-CI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:20:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::332]:55072) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kz3fX-0000Fw-Mo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:20:05 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id i63so358410wma.4 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 12:20:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-followup-to:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Fet61rKDajzuJDr54sD8eOMsHPuq+MTj1t0Z3yPFxdw=; b=j+EjmnxYlwFU0f5KR2Cy6DpJmtJUqkjj/xtAMAPqzz3ubmXbf1LpbbKK2EMN8jMm9U zM3zmcXHZeg1B4DurE+slLBTGoERAGZe5zzgv3zjk8IvksEZfXVw7Q/TpBdVkMgUel/Q u2HmuqOMj5b1/EFaAn3VZNIFM4ErGAnqE4ViYPHXZlkZUcqebDmQSUsbMmGkFHxFDjR+ VQVL3JX+LEYnmDdRid1Eu5/9BU2OkZOqpDLDyRQ0XiAqKhDZ/nlUUTEJ0Yv/M3jcFp6h ofx3fGu57N/nD5AGx3/1uzR43caiJe2vBT3f4QloU7V6gilCshVJ0NtVqAotx6Z1xQom nV4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-followup-to :mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Fet61rKDajzuJDr54sD8eOMsHPuq+MTj1t0Z3yPFxdw=; b=iR05hwBvb6s8xfrkrBEvBsLnwNKXpTSNRBeFzz5FOILMpCTT+/1O59ObxI4ptL7o1w 5SzZagp45CN5wZyWJLKMAZrOmGh8skvT816EDVZR0chbYhhZjlQBibM137zLuVuA65hL VnDWqulcnknBlGTOeEjGKzKzS+8pbaCbaF24M7WzLh1e+DqGfP/9Tb+MGIT3fOXUlaSk rJSd2dENZvnT1ocNkxvoKk+wX4fLoV1xsx3LSEB6JzxTsGMTAoBCqVnO+g+RsJCykhT0 xVihUfMGR3o998P3c9CaXDjqFmRKYzYttwbEf/N0eAqMlIYs8H9IdbNPaC9njUtzV1RW uS2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+ZMCVmCa+DDKNyrhw7RSBNbscf+kYz5H80OzrpoOt4+u3/fbd CL/eMbtcuARmNT6vq6p5Jsrj0nzKmqM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw5HGvyqxXira92fGpbajiKHam5MbJ0zn5FZJqwczYy7e7v9EaI5AINzq3udtj2d6uDL009cg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4489:: with SMTP id r131mr482798wma.24.1610396401716; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 12:20:01 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from rltb ([2a01:e34:ecfc:a861:69b6:6aaf:dbd3:8964]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v20sm1115791wra.19.2021.01.11.12.20.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 12:20:00 -0800 (PST) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <87wnwjuv5j.fsf@tcd.ie> (Basil L. Contovounesios's message of "Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:32:24 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::332; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x332.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262932 Archived-At: "Basil L. Contovounesios" writes: > Robert Pluim writes: > >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >>> I'm asking because I'm still bothered by failures in those two tests, >>> and would like to avoid that. I think it's bad if a test fails when >>> there's nothing wrong with Emacs; we should try to skip such tests >>> when we know their results cannot be trusted. >> >> The results can be trusted. However, the assumption of the tests is >> that DNS lookups on AAAA records will work, and return results for >> google.com, which is not the case for you. If you prefer we can change >> the tests to check for "no error" rather than 'returns a result' (is >> there an ERT 'should-not-error' clause)? > > Yes, progn (implicit or otherwise) ;). > [ See the penultimate paragraph in (info "(ert) The should Macro"). ] > > This is definitely a long shot, but any chance bug#45798 relates to > this? It=CA=BCs possible. I=CA=BCll bombard you with questions over there. Robert