From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47868: 28.0.50; [native-comp] vertico package doesn't work when loading the corresponding eln file Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 12:11:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87tuo053s7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87czuryggn.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87zgxsfvkt.fsf@miha-pc> <1b1cc5cb-0656-45b5-258d-7c16322eb7f6@daniel-mendler.de> <83czuoq9mj.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8020"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.5.11; emacs 28.0.50 Cc: 47868@debbugs.gnu.org, Daniel Mendler , jakanakaevangeli@chiru.no, akrl@sdf.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 21 12:30:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lZA7Y-0001yG-9U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 12:30:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39838 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZA7X-00059N-An for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:30:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54372) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZA7P-00059G-7r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45478) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZA7O-0005u6-Vp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:30:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lZA7O-0000Vn-FO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tassilo Horn Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47868 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47868-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47868.16190010001935 (code B ref 47868); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47868) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2021 10:30:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57024 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lZA7L-0000V9-LG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:29:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41668) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lZA7J-0000Uv-RX for 47868@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:29:58 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53696) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZA7E-0005l9-AY; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:29:52 -0400 Original-Received: from auth1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.227]:36119) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lZA7A-0007r7-Ff; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:29:49 -0400 Original-Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E5B27C0054; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:29:47 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:29:47 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvddtkedgfedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfhgfhffvufffjgfkgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefvrghsshhi lhhoucfjohhrnhcuoehtshguhhesghhnuhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepve evieekteekveeigfefffeivdetgeduvdffueeuudevgedttdehvdfhueevfffhnecukfhp peekjedrudeifedrfedurdduheegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrg hmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhrnhdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghl ihhthidqkeeijeefkeejkeegqdeifeehvdelkedqthhsughhpeepghhnuhdrohhrghesfh grshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: from thinkpad-t440p (p57a31f9a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.163.31.154]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A9440240054; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:29:46 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <83czuoq9mj.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:204594 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Daniel Mendler >> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:05:21 +0200 >> Cc: 47868@debbugs.gnu.org, tsdh@gnu.org >> >> Is it uncommon to use propertized string literals > > Not sure if it's common, but IMNSHO it's somewhat ugly and hard to > read (and easy to make mistakes). So my recommendation is not to use > that; use propertize instead. In the concrete example at hand, which is "add properties to a specific substring of the string", I think it is not more ugly and hard to read than having to split the string and propertize the individual parts and then concatenate it back again. Well, maybe it's on par here but I cannot even imagine how to use `propertize' to create a string where properties overlap without jumping through hoops. Hm, when I do #("foo" 0 3 (bar t) 1 2 (foo 1)) I get #("foo" 0 1 (bar t) 1 2 (foo 1) 2 3 (bar t)) which I did not expect. I'd rather expect #("foo" 0 1 (bar t) 1 2 (foo 1 bar t) 2 3 (bar t)) so it seems like the propertized string literals also have some gotchas... Bye, Tassilo