From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27229: eldoc wrong highlighting for "when" Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 13:09:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87tua6yirx.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87k0w6dg58.fsf@web.de> <87o89a12nc.fsf@gnus.org> <86lf4dwxk8.fsf@gmail.com> <874kb1wwru.fsf@gnus.org> <86y28dd1r9.fsf@gmail.com> <87zgssu9sl.fsf@gnus.org> <86wnnwlbjm.fsf@gmail.com> <875yvgqwsy.fsf@gnus.org> <87y1zk1b1b.fsf@gnus.org> <835ymn6hum.fsf@gnu.org> <87fslr0ywx.fsf@gnus.org> <83r15a514r.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5274"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, 27229@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 03 13:24:11 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nlqdW-0001Cy-Eo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 13:24:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54698 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nlqdV-0005mS-4B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 07:24:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55410) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nlqPq-0002FC-On for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 07:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44869) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nlqPp-0004CL-Vk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 07:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nlqPp-00007r-KL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 07:10:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 11:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27229 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 27229-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27229.1651576191462 (code B ref 27229); Tue, 03 May 2022 11:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27229) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2022 11:09:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38766 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nlqPf-00007O-9s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 07:09:51 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:54234) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nlqPc-00007A-MX for 27229@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 07:09:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dzXLnonxTIDLQx5yF6ruQhFHUUJzMZ8HYVcJIV/JdFw=; b=cjM1B3qdFXEfQXgEIJBPdgvE8H M4W/jK+tps1KgKc7QcjGJDcMRK4X7M45qEPZvcDcbKqOrbmDNqFG2MUPPraHwSy39Jl1pL4VVLcPt ondcBNdbR7Gq5gF9nuv9slt1qitXREkGvSCSDcgfvEOOYfhAY9tcUGoKqMIaByOwrbRI=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nlqPT-0004YE-EY; Tue, 03 May 2022 13:09:41 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAElBMVEUQFBg5TF1VcZBv hp3Bwr////9uWi7SAAAAAWJLR0QF+G/pxwAAAAd0SU1FB+YFAwsHAeKPOxEAAAGySURBVDjLdZMB muIwCIVh9gJA9wCFeIBJ4gXcnfufaR9J1GrdWLVf/vIID0pESh8XqwquM9CxhM8RkhH4+0/EWUzd wgLsQ3JTE/qQX8hpPwM8y2r+ITvSI4eQTGF7O5ev+5g3eFABnKuNEs3DEY8FzuxKhgMIcXhIxidg 6NL3l6R2An2CPBZPH49AOYEOkOoj94yQuxucWVWZeSRHjlVbrFXGqeC4z+osDstXNbKE/BVwgohz RIIXoZhpE3B72Z59w49sh+0sbQBHxFAqvcWO6XgAkgFKd9TEonepWAAuk4o++5Ngm4MyXMuOZBcg RYLqk+TMRMNntMfXOE7DW+mQraOfAEMjSuvROlaro20ISol+WHW0jXi3UvobQITwftymCTBKxvtz uy2ArG6uT/C97QPoG7jeSjrq94iZA4VdbigzTTRtCXBJvlby+1aGMQBR8epIvgfohF7+2gH4fDty 7H5+ZAKkSKnpU1i7Avzq8CojDPlLSZeiX/4QQHuAVXnguERb1mHmFd8NXk9QhbbSskCrcGVLL3ov /SoAfQCtqjt7DgMiGtED4LA5u/yYgi9Y8g/BjluI0nu+VwAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAy Mi0wNS0wM1QxMTowNzowMCswMDowMJfLtbAAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjItMDUtMDNU MTE6MDc6MDArMDA6MDDmlg0MAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Depeche Mode's _Some Great Reward_: "Master And Servant" In-Reply-To: <83r15a514r.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 03 May 2022 14:03:32 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:231320 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > But when and unless aren't functions, they are "special forms". So > using &rest there is less self-explanatory for those who aren't > necessarily privy to the internals. 'defmacro.*&rest.body' gives me 487 results, and only `when' and `until' had that odd (fn). If we want *Help* to display &rest body in a different way, then we should fix that in help-mode, not mess up the calling convention string. > IOW, the removed (fn ..." stuff was there for a reason. The original > bug report here wasn't about how we display the doc string, it was > about what eldoc does. So IMO the fix should have been in eldoc, > which would also avoid this negative effect. As the bug report explains, there is no fix possible, since the "..." syntax is ambiguous: We use it both for "and then there's more" and "there are alternating pairs of arguments". -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no