From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#55039: [PATCH] Use VC-relative file names in ChangeLog entries Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 14:56:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87tu5i81nr.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8735i7zvk4.fsf@posteo.net> <83v8v3sq0n.fsf@gnu.org> <87czc8u56q.fsf@gnus.org> <871qsooenn.fsf@posteo.net> <87o7vsfu5p.fsf@posteo.net> <83y1uwijzt.fsf@gnu.org> <87bkrsdzzm.fsf@posteo.net> <83mtbafip7.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfl26ypw.fsf@posteo.net> <87lequ3w20.fsf@gnus.org> <878rmuxdmg.fsf@gmail.com> <87bkrq3v13.fsf@gnus.org> <8735d26npz.fsf@posteo.net> <87wnae2fz8.fsf@gnus.org> <87y1uu58p8.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21361"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Visuwesh , Eli Zaretskii , 55039@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 08 15:24:28 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oWHW6-0005KI-FW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 15:24:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56818 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWHW5-0007Ny-9d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 09:24:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42362) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWH6Y-0006WD-Hs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 08:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40687) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWH6Y-0005n6-11 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 08:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWH6X-0001AE-Te for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 08:58:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 12:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55039 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo patch Original-Received: via spool by 55039-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55039.16626418274408 (code B ref 55039); Thu, 08 Sep 2022 12:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 55039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Sep 2022 12:57:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57619 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWH5f-000191-C0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 08:57:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com ([209.85.221.41]:38607) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWH5b-00018C-H1 for 55039@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 08:57:05 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id b5so25927927wrr.5 for <55039@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 05:57:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=yPEEdcYsdFxexAHV05IElAg/finSSDzjs2X21puBT+E=; b=MIhankAQUMJdJSdK7Tat+kJ87JZMOCw7q6zVlwMdQ3jT3Z3yEjKzGluyGk/CXxlk2x Hiu2MI4pBT8V5vBWEEq/g7+7uThwDOqQuF9+qxtiAxdobfdvR2o0JJK6ZK9ztCtk9HzX Sd80Os+ccySHFjTtm/Ig22xoOTT4hH+D0bkSqO6ccqQNVsbz/lZDQuTnz7jbldS6JsMd 6ZJRCvl8Ds+6ABHE4Sxq7upeZfLaQj+MDwRMafTn6Qyehn04zTCQJ3jCW5KizhZseVEP EXYy8hEoSwg+w+tVt1F7ASZHP8p0JDx4M+wg/+oySvqzo78GHOnb/NLW3wDWM/jgD2/U jFrg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=yPEEdcYsdFxexAHV05IElAg/finSSDzjs2X21puBT+E=; b=rdEROm8z0ugVFnv8ANVDDOQVQWCaJR6FMYmiO9yaICMrUYG9wQxNLcx86fgLHXwB/m BkrNAPmT217h9BaveJIxfM7N3vLLPH3Nr7Tzwk30D4v9wp1sxSfKF3Ci1670XV+RmMnt 5nLIX4FSkrCStSOZhwFwM/Q1HOkpw3I87JkIZpbTQxmP08VNhdEiPt+eohBxIJquadkw KQr0RpCGShm+MZa6bgu2z4WP3kGznQR1xBT8f8kvPjRM+FvhyIXlU4ErYBwf2ODZUdmy RZiimCNSrF5DlvXoPTAelfsDYmQ4Zyh3naSAKaR9Vfs5uQn8gmOicKI5qZEYtUP0Q97w XacQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo35JkI0t5jp5WxCIbLcE/+89M54x2vU8r3UEgeBu7tExxbQvvcB Rtd7wtY07tVzarZIwU9l8S4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6ZquHq9OsHGBCpbFPvo+0M4QyMT9An2w6fef52G7xYhgal86qJiW5xIK/mYVwtQZX37Ks1+A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f98b:0:b0:22a:2946:d98f with SMTP id f11-20020adff98b000000b0022a2946d98fmr3116409wrr.636.1662641817686; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 05:56:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([2a01:e0a:3f3:fb50:c77e:eb83:4552:e88d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h41-20020a05600c49a900b003a604a29a34sm2461414wmp.35.2022.09.08.05.56.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Sep 2022 05:56:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y1uu58p8.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Thu, 08 Sep 2022 12:53:07 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:241884 Archived-At: >>>>> On Thu, 08 Sep 2022 12:53:07 +0000, Philip Kaludercic said: Philip> Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> Philip Kaludercic writes: >> >>>> But is that backwards-compatible? >>> ^ typo? >> >> No? >> >>> If you meant incompatible, it is any more or less incompatible than >>> adding the boundp to the end of the line? >> >> It was a question -- I wouldn't have asked if I knew what the answer >> was. Philip> In that case I am confused, if Philip> ;; boundp foo-bar: t Philip> is backwards-compatible it appears preferable. File mode specification error: (user-error Malformed local variable line: "boundp foo-bar: t") Robert --