From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58839: [Patch] Re: bug#58839: 29.0.50; project-kill-buffer fails when Eglot is running Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 10:48:36 +0000 Message-ID: <87tu3jgdbv.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87sfj8umwb.fsf@posteo.net> <87edur3lil.fsf@posteo.net> <87a65f3j40.fsf@posteo.net> <213f3549-de4e-25a7-5e27-d13893e557bc@yandex.ru> <87zgdfwkle.fsf@gmail.com> <8e31a89d-e35e-6dd0-a8e3-f0b9684c8bfa@yandex.ru> <87v8o3wgq1.fsf@gmail.com> <87ilk2x1si.fsf@gmail.com> <871qqq7l9p.fsf@posteo.net> <87eduqwekz.fsf@gmail.com> <87wn8invbx.fsf@posteo.net> <877d0iw8iq.fsf@gmail.com> <837d0hhlke.fsf@gnu.org> <46ff0065-5645-ef1e-2621-242fb6a73f98@yandex.ru> <87v8o0uxn5.fsf@gmail.com> <787a4362-7ff5-7dbb-9118-16e4bee5f328@yandex.ru> <87edunvhf2.fsf@gmail.com> <6d4d9e72-1bae-4d64-b7c1-c2b9c11e396f@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33566"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 58839@debbugs.gnu.org, manuel.uberti@inventati.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 01 11:49:31 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1opopm-0008aI-Np for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 11:49:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opopX-00035E-UH; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 06:49:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opopO-000305-GB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 06:49:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opopL-0005jk-0T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 06:49:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1opopK-0003eg-FB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 06:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Philip Kaludercic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 10:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58839 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 58839-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58839.166729972814021 (code B ref 58839); Tue, 01 Nov 2022 10:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58839) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2022 10:48:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42830 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1opop6-0003e5-69 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 06:48:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:56209) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1opop4-0003dn-5T for 58839@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 06:48:46 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F87D240108 for <58839@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:48:40 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1667299720; bh=C2l4nFq11iu9wU5lcwQLKk2+PLCKj2RaNHvGdbebmtU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=nO37SwuqqzsK61uk1C0g1y8TSoeQ2Y/AuwXvE1qxk8mN9rggvlKzfirpX48hQcTte gl308k3kVcGv0LZqbQkSckbeb89uDEArU5MXy+2TTyIAcAo1pQyAIWzXkPeY4++QKQ pzJgrTELKFlj2x0bZdQpXpn2C1gtMu7o/znvE7ikRAeAsBXN4cmyZ3Q+EV0z82WX8h 08jSTTftJmNh9SHp2eGk3Ez57T2d+4Z47Lvb+YfqhI1EsCarzvc7LptFCb1KZR1rwZ u5sPl+AMgE3LS3D+Qct4VuK0tIDDNw1+Y7YYj04ZazlOIW1+zeQAEYLhgmk8qwykT6 eGL3A8fw917/g== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4N1mw45nX4z9rxV; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:48:36 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <6d4d9e72-1bae-4d64-b7c1-c2b9c11e396f@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Tue, 1 Nov 2022 00:51:53 +0200") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:246761 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: >>>> The mini-languages invented in project-kill-buffers-conditions and >>>> project-ignore-buffer-conditions are abominations. >>> This is the point where I'd normally blacklist you again. >> I had no idea who authored those variables. If you are among the >> authors, I'm very sorry, I was referring merely to code. I said before >> I'm quite happy with project.el, but this (small) part of it is very >> badly done. > > I'm not the only author. Regardless, it's not a good language to use > no matter who wrote it. I believe that was me... BTW, if there are major objections to the language, I should point out that the new `buffer-match-p' in Emacs 29 uses the same language and has already found usage in a number of spots in core Emacs. There would still be time to address any issues you might have, and avoid a long-term mistake.