From: "João Távora" <joaotavora@gmail.com>
To: Matt Wittmann <mcwitt@gmail.com>
Cc: 62065@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#62065: 30.0.50; No prompt to confirm unsafe local variables when eglot-ensure used in major mode hook
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 19:40:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ttyppxkt.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJmFQmSozRh3yoO7pe=NXgc7-j1f75yKEpHb1m+jyoB1Mc-Gng@mail.gmail.com> (Matt Wittmann's message of "Sat, 11 Mar 2023 08:23:30 -0800")
Matt Wittmann <mcwitt@gmail.com> writes:
>> Matt can you confirm this as well (both the error and the non-setting)?
>
> Confirmed both! (Sorry, I hadn't noticed the relevant message before.)
I've pushed a fix to emacs-29. The commit message (which I repeat at
the end of this email) explains the convoluted problem.
There is a follow up problem. If the user answer "no" to the prompt
which now correctly appears, that user will likely be prompted again
immediately afterwards.
That's because Eglot uses dir-locals, but only to get at the value of
'eglot-workspace-configuration'. This variable is usually automatically
safe and won't motivate the prompt, but other unsafe variables are also
"pulled in", and they motivate the prompt.
I don't know how to fix this effectively without enhancing the
dir-locals logic to allow for Eglot to ask to "pull in" just one
variable, eglot-workspace-configuration.
An attempt was made to bind noninteractive to true around Eglot's
hack-dir-local-variables. That means that there is never the second
prompt. Theoretically should allow eglot-workspace-configuration to
come through if it is safe, even if other variables beside it are
unsafe.
Except that it doesn't. Could this be an alternative?
So I'm at a loss here. The situation is better after the commit, but
this safety-related confusion, where eglot-workspace-configuration
somehow isn't set when neighbouring unsafe variables, can exist even
eglot-ensure _isn't_ used.
João
ommit b916ec88b2ffe22a49128f17cdfb78f0ab1bc713
Author: João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com>
Date: Sun Mar 12 18:19:40 2023 +0000
Make eglot-ensure's post-command-hook run a bit later (bug#62065)
'eglot-ensure', typically used in the major-mode-hook, use
'post-command-hook' to schedule an automated, non-interactive
connection attempt to a server. The goal is to connect when the
buffer is ready, i.e. after the user command that found the file.
However, if there are dir-local or buffer-local variables to confirm,
finding the file will cause a minibuffer prompt to appear.
In that case, 'eglot-ensure's addition to the global post-command-hook
runs before it was intended too and a connection is started
prematurely.
In turn, this means that a call to 'hack-dir-local-variables' -- which
is part of the connection process -- which also needs a minibuffer
prompt, collides with the previous one. This generates an error and
confuses the user, who doesn't know if the directory-local variables
have been applied or not.
This commit fixes the clash by having 'eglot-ensure' set
'post-command-hook' buffer-locally. This causes the automated
connection to take place, as intended, after the user's original
file-finding command has ended.
However, the problem reported in bug#62065 is not completely fixed.
If the user answers "no" to the first "confirm local variables"
"prompt, she will be prompted again in the second one. A subsequent
commit will address this separate problem.
* lisp/progmodes/eglot.el (eglot-ensure): Use buffer-local post-command-hook.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-12 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-08 20:59 bug#62065: 30.0.50; No prompt to confirm unsafe local variables when eglot-ensure used in major mode hook Matt Wittmann
2023-03-11 9:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-03-11 11:13 ` João Távora
2023-03-11 15:01 ` João Távora
2023-03-11 16:23 ` Matt Wittmann
2023-03-12 19:40 ` João Távora [this message]
2023-03-20 1:07 ` Matt Wittmann
2023-03-20 1:21 ` João Távora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ttyppxkt.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=joaotavora@gmail.com \
--cc=62065@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=mcwitt@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.