Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:

> Yes, as soon as one is sending a message to [bugnumber]@debbugs.gnu.org,
> everything is fine.  The issue if you Cc me directly, is that if I don't
> watch out, I'll send my response to bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, and thus
> create a new bug.

Thanks, that's clear now.

> I am not sure we want that behaviour at all actually.  Just because
> there is a typo in the documentation, doesn't mean the package is
> unusable.  The user should be able to install the package, be notified
> about the error -- if the have the time, they can fix it and send the
> maintainer a patch resolving the issue for everyone.  Likewise, if the
> user updates a package, it wouldn't make sense to ignore everything or
> worse still revert the update due to a small mistake in the
> documentation file.
>
> ...
>
> There is no reason why we cannot already create and use the buffer
> earlier, to log org-related bugs.  One has to be careful when emptying
> the buffer, but it might make sense to have a separate buffer for each
> package, especially when updating multiple packages at once...

Please see attached patches.