From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: texinfo.tex change. Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:11:22 -0500 Message-ID: <87sm404f0u.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <876513nswn.fsf@xs4all.nl> <874qgn87cu.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87braphhgw.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1108311244 853 80.91.229.2 (13 Feb 2005 16:14:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 13 17:14:04 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D0MNd-0003YN-Qs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:13:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D0Md0-0005Q3-Gq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:29:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D0MYh-000376-Bx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:25:19 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D0MYd-00035T-Rg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:25:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D0MYd-00034o-Lb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:25:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.74] (helo=tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D0MLC-0007zV-TB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:11:23 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor ([65.92.240.235]) by tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20050213161122.LZDD2034.tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:11:22 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0F20AD7315; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:11:22 -0500 (EST) Original-To: belanger@truman.edu In-Reply-To: <87braphhgw.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> (Jay Belanger's message of "Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:26:55 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33341 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33341 >> The problem is that La@TeX{} has a half-graphical Logo when >> typesetting with TeX. >> >> I think we have used that for ages--should we really consider it a >> "problem"? > I don't think doing something for a long time automatically makes it > not a problem. La@TeX{} seems to me to be a quick-and-easy way > to approximate the LaTeX logo, but it's only an approximation and > should eventually be done properly. It'll be eventually done properly. It's just that the @LaTeX macro is too recent to be used just now, Stefan