From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: default-indicate-buffer-boundaries Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 09:52:55 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87slqw3i0o.fsf@jurta.org> References: <200601311925.k0VJPHJ09839@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200602020000.k1200mQ05508@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200602031820.k13IKXQ12242@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200602050057.k150vsM03822@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139221987 27206 80.91.229.2 (6 Feb 2006 10:33:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 10:33:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 06 11:33:05 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F63g5-0006eB-W3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 11:33:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F63jN-0003fX-MA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 05:36:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F63gp-0002Kk-4F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 05:33:48 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F63gn-0002JO-BL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 05:33:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F63gm-0002Iu-Cm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 05:33:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.98] (helo=mail.neti.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F63gJ-0003pC-9x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 05:33:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-32-77-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.32.77]) by Relayhost1.neti.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45621D9A0; Mon, 6 Feb 2006 12:30:08 +0200 (EET) Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-Reply-To: <200602050057.k150vsM03822@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (Luc Teirlinck's message of "Sat, 4 Feb 2006 18:57:54 -0600 (CST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) (Debian) at neti.ee X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50099 Archived-At: > > I believe that Miles, the only person complaining about them > > being "too much in your face" uses a non-default fringe > > background color. > > I also find them too vivid. (I use a dark background. Does the > default for a light background look fine in that circumstance?) > > I can not speak for other people, but it looks perfectly fine on the > default light background to me. Actually it depends on the default font size rather than on the background. I use a light background and small font size, and default fringe icons look very ugly to me. They are bigger and more "fat" than average characters. They look like a fly sitting on the screen :-) -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/