From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Zhang Wei Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Is this a bug of Emacs-Lisp? Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:47:41 +0800 Message-ID: <87slqipmde.fsf@emacsfans.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1140198791 14782 80.91.229.2 (17 Feb 2006 17:53:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 17 18:53:08 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FA9mo-0007RV-35 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:52:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FA72F-0008Kk-KA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:56:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F9yTI-0007yo-9L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:48:00 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F9yTE-0007wK-3v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:47:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F9yTB-0007un-Qo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:47:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.166.176] (helo=pproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F9yYT-0007P2-Jj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:53:21 -0500 Original-Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id e30so389782pya for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:47:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=K2nhnoxmHlNvOFGcXcZu9aGwqiZ2eaDBsOnFzVAHCdhBH1HMM3hHtZobZLRJ9PVebWyZRZr4XSR1PZbF9UzysOmyoFV3ryr6bSKbJjEJBCpuzqnOIQOyKSC5sR2EL6oWqIzWc13jFbugLL+r7M6AH3u6aJtR6OaTgA+4V148ew8= Original-Received: by 10.35.78.13 with SMTP id f13mr148300pyl; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:47:49 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from emacsfans.org ( [218.56.219.168]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id z80sm241402pyg.2006.02.16.21.47.48; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:47:49 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zhangwei by emacsfans.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1F9ySz-00022e-TD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:47:41 +0800 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50661 Archived-At: (defun dummy () '(1 . 2)) (dummy) => (1 . 2) (setcdr (dummy) 3) (dummy) => (1 . 3) Modify the return value of dummy changed it's defination. Is this a bug of Elisp? If it's not. How does this happen? -- Zhang Wei or Brep